In a Force vs Distance graph, is work the area underneath?

Click For Summary
In a Force vs Distance graph, the work done is represented by the area under the curve, with force plotted on the y-axis and distance on the x-axis. The correct method to calculate work when force varies is to use the area of the trapezoids formed by the graph, rather than simply multiplying force by distance for each segment. The calculations provided led to different results, highlighting the importance of using the appropriate method for varying forces. The area under the graph can be calculated using the formula for the area of a triangle or trapezoid, which accounts for the changing force. Understanding the relationship between force, distance, and work is crucial for accurate calculations in physics.
carmenn
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

In a Force vs Distance graph, is work the area underneath?
A person pushes a shovel into the ground to do some spring gardening. He applies a force to the shovel over the following displacement.

0 N - 0 m
4 N - .02 m
8 N - .04 m
12 N - .06 m

Draw a graph, and find work done by man on shovel over the .06 m. 2. Homework Equations
F x d = W

The Attempt at a Solution


So at first, I calculated all the work, using F x d, and added all of them together, but he said that was wrong. And after we multiplied each of the the force by .02 since its in intervals and then added, but apparently we were wrong again. We have drawn a graph, that is a straight line. Is the area underneath the work? If so, why? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the area underneath the graphed line is the work, tho' you should be using the x-axis for the distance, and the y-axis for the force(that's simply the common convention). Can you show me how you arrived at yoru answer?
 
why is distance on the x axis?

well, if i use the area under the graph, then it'd be

distance x force / 2

.06 x 12 / 2

.36 J

But can someone explain why? Since i had come up with 1.12 J when adding them all together, and .48 J when using the interval method
 
I'm not particularly sure how you came up with 0.36J and 1.12. Can you show me how you arrived at those answers both mathematically and with words? Keep in mind that the equation W = Fcos(\theta)\Delta x is used to find the work done by a constant force. From 0 to 0.06m, the force varies, and this is why we use the interval method. Does that make sense?
 
I'm actually not sure what I did, but after reading what you wrote and doing a bit of asking around, I finally have the answer. Thank you for your help! Much appreciated!
 
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
621
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K