Calculate Ionic Strength of Ca2+ in 0.01M CaCO3 Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter higherme
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ionic Strength
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the ionic strength of Ca2+ in a 0.01M CaCO3 solution, the equation u=0.5 sum(Mi)(zi)^2 is used, where M represents concentration and z represents charge. The discussion clarifies that ionic strength is a property of the entire solution rather than individual ions, making the question about calculating only Ca2+ somewhat meaningless. Including both Ca2+ and CO3^2- in the calculation yields an ionic strength of 0.04M, while considering only Ca2+ results in 0.02M. The intent behind the question seems to focus on the contribution of Ca2+ alone, but it's important to understand that ionic strength cannot be defined for individual species. Overall, the concept of ionic strength should encompass all ions present in the solution.
higherme
Messages
126
Reaction score
0
Calculate the ionic strength of Ca2+ in a 0.01M CaCO3 solution.

equation to use is:

u=0.5 sum(Mi)(zi)^2
where M is the concentration and z is the charge of the species

my question is when I am calculating the ionic strength of Ca2+, do I have to include
CO3^2- that is in that solution?

so, it would be :

U=0.5 (0.01M Ca2+)(2+)^2 + (0.01M CO3^2-)(2-)^2
U=0.04M

if I don't include:
U=0.5 (0.01M Ca2+)(2+)^2
U=0.02M
 
Physics news on Phys.org
higherme said:
Calculate the ionic strength of Ca2+ in a 0.01M CaCO3 solution.
The question is meaningless to me. The ionic strength is defined for the entire solution, not for individual species.

As meaningless as it may be, it appears that the questioner what's you to calculate the contribution of Ca2+ alone (your second calculation). But this is just my interpretation of intent.

If you get a chance, please inform the person that wrote this question that ionic strength is not defined for individual species. If this is from a book, please cite the title, author, edition and page number.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top