How to determine energy required to hold an object in air

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter xw3850
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Energy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Determining the energy required to hold an object in air involves understanding the biological and mechanical aspects of muscle function. While no work is done on the object itself when it is held stationary, energy is expended by the human body due to muscle contractions, which convert chemical energy into heat. The discussion highlights that the energy cost can be conceptualized as the difference between power input and output in the system maintaining the force against gravity. This indicates that while the object remains at rest, the human body still expends energy to maintain its position.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly force and work.
  • Knowledge of human muscle physiology and energy expenditure.
  • Familiarity with power calculations (J/s) in mechanical systems.
  • Awareness of the principles of thermodynamics related to energy conversion.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of muscle contraction and energy expenditure in human physiology.
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium and how they apply to forces acting on stationary objects.
  • Explore the concept of power output in biological systems versus mechanical systems.
  • Investigate thermodynamic principles related to energy transformation and heat generation in muscles.
USEFUL FOR

Physiologists, biomechanics researchers, fitness professionals, and anyone interested in the interplay between human muscle function and energy expenditure during static activities.

xw3850
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
For me to hold a heavy object stationary in air is tough and eventually I will get tired. So it seems I am expending energy. But then how much? I discovered it was quite hard (for me anyway) to calculate how much energy it costs to hold the object when there is no work.

The only thing I could come up with requires knowledge about the system that is creating the force that opposes gravity. I suppose if you can determine how much power is going into the system and how much is going out then the difference is what it costs (J/s) to create the force to hold the object per unit of time.

Is this really the only way to do it? It seems like there should be a better way because this is more like an efficiency calculation and I know different system would require different amounts of energy (per unit of time) to create the same force.

I have a hunch I am missing something fundamental or making a mistake in my reasoning. Am I right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The matter of the fact is that there is _no_ work being done when an object is just being suspended in mid-air. The feeling of expending energy is purely a biological concept, because in order to lift something we must displace our own bodies from its "equilibrium" (e.g. to stay upright and such). So yes, there is energy being expended, but none of that energy is really being transferred anywhere (not into the weights your carrying as their speed and gravitational potential remain the same), other than into heat as you sweat holding those weights up.

Would you expend more energy holding weights arms straight in front of you or just by tying them over your shoulders? If there's a discrepancy, would you owe it to the laws of physics or the mechanics/biology/anatomy of your body?
 
Human muscles work not like machines. Let say a crane holds a mass in the air, it does no work, no energy lost. But if a man hold something off the ground, he creates work, the work turns into heat. The muscle works by continuous contraction of many many small cells that requires energy (probably chemical energy) and exhausts heat.
Sorry I do not know exactly how the muscle cells work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
11K