Register to reply

Cross section

by touqra
Tags: cross
Share this thread:
touqra
#1
Jan17-08, 05:32 PM
P: 282
What does it mean when they say s wave cross section, p wave cross section .. ?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physical constant is constant even in strong gravitational fields
Physicists provide new insights into the world of quantum materials
Nuclear spins control current in plastic LED: Step toward quantum computing, spintronic memory, better displays
malawi_glenn
#2
Jan18-08, 01:47 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
malawi_glenn's Avatar
P: 4,738
Quote Quote by touqra View Post
What does it mean when they say s wave cross section, p wave cross section .. ?
the [itex]l[/itex]-quantum number of the incoming wave. You often have a plane wave coming in to the target. The plane wave you write as a linear combination of spherical waves, and you call this "Partial Wave expansion".

http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teachin...es/node70.html

The [itex]l[/itex] that you see in eq 957 is then the "[itex]l[/itex] - QM number".
And [itex]l[/itex] is denoted by, 0 = s, 1 = p, 2 = d, etc, same as in atomic physics notation.

Semiclassicaly, you can see the [itex]l[/itex] as the classical angular momenta of the incoming particle with respect to the centre of the scattering potential. And also the [itex]l[/itex] is quantisized, so only some values of [itex]l[/itex] are allowed.

Now since the sum goes to infinity in eq 957, we cut of where we expect no partial waves to contribute. And that is often assigned by [tex] l_{max} \approx R\cdot k [/tex]
Where R is the range of the potential and k is the momenta of the incoming particle (wave number).

Now the cross section is proportional to the scattering amplitude modulus square, i.e the modulus square of eq. 965 times a constant with alot of pi's hbar's etc.

So the s-cross section, you only have [itex]l[/itex] = 0 in you sum, and p-cross section only [itex]l[/itex] = 1. etc.

I hope you got the idea =)
Smoochie
#3
Jan22-08, 01:40 PM
P: 3
Hello,
To munch the QM into an analogy:
Another way to look at is - how does one particle look to another. If you assume the target particle to be ball-like, then in its basic form (ground state), you'll get the classic 3D cross-section - this is how it will appear to the incoming particle and such it will be scattered from the target particle. But if the particle is excited to a higher state, then it will no longer appear as a ball but something else entirely. And vice versa.
Smoochie


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Cross section High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 5
Cross Section calculation Advanced Physics Homework 2
Cross section weighting High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 0
Cross section of a S wave Advanced Physics Homework 1
Absorption Cross Section Nuclear Engineering 1