Register to reply

Cross section

by touqra
Tags: cross
Share this thread:
touqra
#1
Jan17-08, 05:32 PM
P: 282
What does it mean when they say s wave cross section, p wave cross section .. ?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Refocusing research into high-temperature superconductors
Neutron tomography technique reveals phase fractions of crystalline materials in 3-dimensions
Tiny magnets, huge fields: Nanoscale ferromagnetic electrodes create chemical equivalent of solid-state spin valve
malawi_glenn
#2
Jan18-08, 01:47 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
malawi_glenn's Avatar
P: 4,739
Quote Quote by touqra View Post
What does it mean when they say s wave cross section, p wave cross section .. ?
the [itex]l[/itex]-quantum number of the incoming wave. You often have a plane wave coming in to the target. The plane wave you write as a linear combination of spherical waves, and you call this "Partial Wave expansion".

http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teachin...es/node70.html

The [itex]l[/itex] that you see in eq 957 is then the "[itex]l[/itex] - QM number".
And [itex]l[/itex] is denoted by, 0 = s, 1 = p, 2 = d, etc, same as in atomic physics notation.

Semiclassicaly, you can see the [itex]l[/itex] as the classical angular momenta of the incoming particle with respect to the centre of the scattering potential. And also the [itex]l[/itex] is quantisized, so only some values of [itex]l[/itex] are allowed.

Now since the sum goes to infinity in eq 957, we cut of where we expect no partial waves to contribute. And that is often assigned by [tex] l_{max} \approx R\cdot k [/tex]
Where R is the range of the potential and k is the momenta of the incoming particle (wave number).

Now the cross section is proportional to the scattering amplitude modulus square, i.e the modulus square of eq. 965 times a constant with alot of pi's hbar's etc.

So the s-cross section, you only have [itex]l[/itex] = 0 in you sum, and p-cross section only [itex]l[/itex] = 1. etc.

I hope you got the idea =)
Smoochie
#3
Jan22-08, 01:40 PM
P: 3
Hello,
To munch the QM into an analogy:
Another way to look at is - how does one particle look to another. If you assume the target particle to be ball-like, then in its basic form (ground state), you'll get the classic 3D cross-section - this is how it will appear to the incoming particle and such it will be scattered from the target particle. But if the particle is excited to a higher state, then it will no longer appear as a ball but something else entirely. And vice versa.
Smoochie


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Cross section High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 5
Cross Section calculation Advanced Physics Homework 2
Cross section weighting High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 0
Cross section of a S wave Advanced Physics Homework 1
Absorption Cross Section Nuclear Engineering 1