Boiling the Vacuum: Exploring the Possibilities

In summary, the article describes the most intense laser pulse ever made, and discusses potential applications for intense laser beams.
  • #1
sanman
745
24
"Boiling the Vacuum"

I came across this article describing the most intense laser pulse ever made:

http://www.physorg.com/news122298608.html

In a paragraph near the end, they mention this:

In addition to medical uses, intense laser beams like these could help researchers explore new frontiers in science. At even more extreme intensities, laser beams could potentially "boil the vacuum," which scientists theorize would generate matter by merely focusing light into empty space. Some scientists also see applications in inertial confinement fusion research, coaxing low-mass atoms to join together into heavier ones and release energy in the process.

How exactly does "boiling the vacuum" work? If we take light as a wave passing through a medium of barely-lived virtual particle-antiparticle pairs, are we saying that sufficiently extreme oscillation amplitudes could result in some pairs being imparted enough energy to escape mutual anihilation?

If so, then could experiments be conducted to test for a "foam" medium that lacks a reference frame? (I've always sort of visualized a "quantum foam" as something like the "snow" on your television screen, whereby all the blinking points of light are so dynamic and briefly-lived that they can't give you a reference frame or sense of movement as you pan your eyes across the snowy/fizzy screen.)

I'm assuming that only extrema conditions can allow us to detect the "foam". Some researchers have sought to look a very distant, massive stars, thinking that their high energy passing across an extremely large distance would reveal the structure of space. But could this extremely intense laser reduce the need for a distance factor, and allow us to see the structure of space just from the extreme intensity of the laser itself?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I've always wondered if there might be some way to "supercavitate" the vacuum, like that Russian sqval torpedo that can overcome the water's resistance to travel extremely fast. If a spaceship could achieve such "supercavitation" of the vacuum, and suppress/reduce the vacuum oscillations ahead of it, then it might work like that Alcubierre Warp Drive concept, which is based on the idea of "negative space". From what I can see, "negative space" would be space that has less vacuum fluctuations compared to normal space. Sort of like how the vapor bubble around a supercavitating torpedo has less density than liquid water. Or like how the protruding bluntbody surface in front of a quiet supersonic aircraft creates a wake in front of the aircraft.

So I would plead for some feedback/commentary from the experts on the forum. Is it conceivable that there could be "cavitation" or "supercavitation" of the vacuum? I realize that the "boiling" analogy is a loosely contrived one, but could it hold upto a macroscopic scale?

If we use ordinary foam as a forced analogy to the conjectured "quantum foam", then how does one measure mach-number or reynolds-number in a foam medium?
 
  • #3


Intro

While I am not a scientist, I am working with the application of cavitation onto biomass as a co-catalyst for its rapid dissolving into sugars which we expect to see catalyzed directly to biodiesel and biogasoline...beyond the ethanol paradigm and its Donner Trail, as we utiilze all of the biomass carbohydrates (80%), as well as other components in the total refining of the "barrel of biomass" into fuel within minutes, not days.

Working with this phenomenon of cavitation in an applied way, and knowing of its mysterious effects of light release..aka sonoluminesence in one induction method, it occurs to me how similar it is in those bubbles to the formation of the vacuum bubble of our universe. In each we have light coming seemingly from nowhere at its origins..many theories, but perhaps no consensus to date on the pre-zero nature of the universe...whereas in the cavitation bubble, we know that a force was applied from outside upon water to achieve the effect, either with the special machine I use, or by those applying modulated frequency inputs into water to cause its boiling.

I can't crunch numbers to compare the two, but they are similar in many ways with their vacuum interior, their light sources surrounded by cold space and their mystery. Could it be that something analgous to water preceded the universe as we know it, and that some force acted upon that universal water analogue...dark energy perhaps, providing for a drawing back rather than the "big explosion" from a dimensionless dot of the "big bang"?

Silly at one level perhaps, but there are not many things that compare to the first moment of the universe that are closer than cavitation...but then I don't know that much...just from my reference point. In the pre-zeroness, could some energy, dark energy, have acted upon some form of matter which we really do not understand yet...dark matter, that resulted in a sucking action which became our universe? It fits with the way nature works around us, the cavitation, or at least the first stage of cavitation (it being "basically" a two stage event of expansion (with a release of light, and "they" say, 5000 degrees heat..with some saying higher, for..is it a pico-second?) being the formation of a vessel, then a second stage in which the bubble collapses and...interesting...a release of an energy wave at the speed of a tsunami traveling through the ocean. BTW..those two stages, deftly delivered gives economic support for biomass hydroysis. Which leads one to think about oscillating universe with the collapse sending out a shockwave into the dark matter post collapse, perhaps becoming the very energy for its next round.

The fascinating tendency for everything to evolve, from a human perspective, would seem to indicate that within the expanding bubble there is some code that tells rocks to want to become people, and beyond.

Cavitation is really cool.

My apologies for not talking in physics speak, but I hope that the ideas aren't "anti physics"...except in a constructively negative, cavitating way.
 
  • #4


Of course, those "evolving" people are just parasites of the local star...
 
  • #5


sanman said:
I came across this article describing the most intense laser pulse ever made:

http://www.physorg.com/news122298608.html

If it eventually pans-out through more work, I find the concept and potential fascinating.
 

1. What is "Boiling the Vacuum"?

"Boiling the Vacuum" refers to the idea of using the vacuum of space as a source of energy by manipulating and harnessing the energy of virtual particles that constantly pop in and out of existence.

2. How is it possible to "boil" a vacuum?

Through the use of specialized equipment and techniques, scientists can create a high-energy environment in the vacuum of space, causing the virtual particles to become real and release energy that can be harnessed.

3. What are the potential applications of "Boiling the Vacuum"?

If successfully implemented, "Boiling the Vacuum" could potentially provide a near-limitless source of energy that is clean and sustainable, revolutionizing the way we power our world.

4. Are there any risks or concerns associated with "Boiling the Vacuum"?

As with any new technology, there are potential risks and concerns that need to be carefully considered, such as the impact on the environment and the potential for misuse or unintended consequences.

5. Is "Boiling the Vacuum" currently being researched or implemented?

While the concept has been explored by scientists, it is still in the early stages of research and has not yet been implemented on a large scale. Further studies and advancements in technology are needed before it can become a reality.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
760
  • Optics
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
994
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
933
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
10
Views
13K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
8K
Back
Top