Is Simpson's Rule Effective for Solving the Intersecting Cylinders Problem?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Xishan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numerical
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effectiveness of Simpson's (1/3) rule for solving the intersecting cylinders problem. Despite utilizing up to 1,000,000 intervals, users report persistent inaccuracies in the numerical solutions. While the results of numerical integration do converge, they consistently exhibit some degree of error, indicating limitations in Simpson's rule for this specific application.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of numerical integration techniques
  • Familiarity with Simpson's (1/3) rule
  • Knowledge of the intersecting cylinders problem
  • Basic skills in error analysis in numerical methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Research alternative numerical integration methods such as Trapezoidal rule
  • Explore adaptive quadrature techniques for improved accuracy
  • Study error analysis specific to numerical integration
  • Investigate the geometric properties of intersecting cylinders
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineers, and researchers working on numerical methods, particularly those focused on geometric problems and integration techniques.

Xishan
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Best numerical technique?

I've recently used Simpson's (1/3) rule for the numerical solution of the 'intersecting cylinders' problem. I've found that it isn't too accurate no matter how many intervals I take (I have even taken 1000,000 intervals!), but still end up with some error.

I'll appreciate anyone for helping me in this matter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the intersecting cylinders problem?
 
it is discussed in the thread called 'intersecting cylinders' in this forum. the results of numerical integration do converge but always with some error
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K