How can I relate four formulas from special relativity to find a solution?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter OneEye
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around relating four formulas from special relativity (SR), specifically focusing on the Lorentz Transformations, a formula for velocity, and the formula for the addition of velocities in SR. Participants seek to derive connections between these equations and clarify their meanings and implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents four key equations from SR and attempts to derive a relationship between them, expressing uncertainty about their progress.
  • Another participant suggests that W is not simply v + w, but rather W = x/t, and provides a method to continue the derivation from w = (x - vt) / (t - (v/c^2)x).
  • A later reply emphasizes the distinction between the three velocities: w (velocity in the primed system), W (velocity in the unprimed system), and v (the speed of one coordinate system relative to the other).
  • There is a discussion about the conceptual relationship between v and W, with acknowledgment that both can be expressed as x/t in different contexts, but they are not equivalent.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationships between the velocities and the equations. There is no consensus on the derivation or the implications of the relationships among the formulas.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of relating the velocities and the potential for misunderstanding their meanings in different contexts. The discussion highlights the need for careful consideration of definitions and assumptions in the derivation process.

OneEye
[SOLVED] Need help with derivation

I have four formulas from SR, and need to relate them. Two are the Lorentz Transform, one is a simple formula for velocity, and the fourth is the formula for the addition of velocity in SR.

[tex]1... x^\prime = { x-vt \over \sqrt { 1-{v^2 \over c^2} } } \quad 2... t^\prime = { { t-{v \over c^2 } x } \over \sqrt { 1-{v^2 \over c^2 } } } \quad 3... x^\prime = wt^\prime \quad 4... W={ v+w \over 1+{vw \over c^2 } }[/tex]

Dr. Einstein says:

Relativity, page 39:

In the equation x'=wt' we must then express x' and t' in terms of x and t, making use of the first and fourth equations of the Lorentz transformation [equations (1) and (2), above)]. Instead of W=v+w, we then obtain the equation [(4) above].

(Hope that made sense.)

I have tried this, and got here:

[tex]w = { x^\prime \over t^\prime }[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow w = { { x-vt \over \sqrt { 1- { v^2 \over c^2 } } } \over { { t - { v \over c^2 } x } \over \sqrt { 1- { v^2 \over c^2 } } }[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow w = { x-vt \over t - { v \over c^2 } x }[/tex]

...so then...

[tex]W=v+{ x-vt \over t - { v \over c^2 } x }[/tex]

...and that's as far as I got. I am quite a ways away from equation (4), above.

Can anyone help me here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
OneEye said:
I have four formulas from SR, and need to relate them. Two are the Lorentz Transform, one is a simple formula for velocity, and the fourth is the formula for the addition of velocity in SR.

[tex]1... x^\prime = { x-vt \over \sqrt { 1-{v^2 \over c^2} } } \quad 2... t^\prime = { { t-{v \over c^2 } x } \over \sqrt { 1-{v^2 \over c^2 } } } \quad 3... x^\prime = wt^\prime \quad 4... W={ v+w \over 1+{vw \over c^2 } }[/tex]

Dr. Einstein says:



(Hope that made sense.)

I have tried this, and got here:

[tex]w = { x^\prime \over t^\prime }[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow w = { { x-vt \over \sqrt { 1- { v^2 \over c^2 } } } \over { { t - { v \over c^2 } x } \over \sqrt { 1- { v^2 \over c^2 } } }[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow w = { x-vt \over t - { v \over c^2 } x }[/tex]

...so then...

[tex]W=v+{ x-vt \over t - { v \over c^2 } x }[/tex]

...and that's as far as I got. I am quite a ways away from equation (4), above.

Can anyone help me here?

Yeah, as he said W is NOT v+w. Instead W is x/t. So continuing from
[tex]w = { x-vt \over t - { v \over c^2 } x }[/tex]
divide the top and bottom by t
[tex]w = { \frac{x}{t}-v \over 1 - { v \over c^2 } \frac{x}{t} }[/tex]
[tex]w = { W-v \over 1 - { Wv \over c^2 } }[/tex]
Solve for W and you will get
[tex]W = { w+v \over 1 + { wv \over c^2 } }[/tex]
 
DW,

Thanks for a quick and thorough response. I was kind of afraid to go there, because it seems to me that there is a pun here between v=x/t and W=x/t.

Clearly both are true in SOME sense, and it is also clear that v<>W (though in the abstract, W is a kind of v).

Do you think that you can spare me another moment and clear that up for me?

Thanks!
 
OneEye said:
DW,

Thanks for a quick and thorough response. I was kind of afraid to go there, because it seems to me that there is a pun here between v=x/t and W=x/t.

Clearly both are true in SOME sense, and it is also clear that v<>W (though in the abstract, W is a kind of v).

Do you think that you can spare me another moment and clear that up for me?

Thanks!

In this context, v is not x/t. W is. There are three velocities being related. There is w which is the velocity of some "thing" according to measurements made from the primed coodinate system. There is W which is the velocity of that same "thing" according to measurements made from the unprimed coordinate system. And then there is v which is the speed of one of the coordinate systems according to measurements made from the other.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K