What Is the Role of J x B in Rotating Magnetic Field Current Drives?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jdo300
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the effects of rotating magnetic fields, particularly in the context of a paper from the University of Washington regarding the Translation, Confinement, and Sustainment (TCS) Experiment. This experiment applies a rotating magnetic field (RMF) to high-temperature field reversed configuration (FRC) plasma to sustain its magnetic flux and extend its lifetime. The RMF current drive technique, which is steady state, contrasts with inductive systems and aims to benchmark against theoretical predictions. Participants express interest in understanding how the J x B equations relate to RMF systems and whether these principles apply beyond plasma to regular conductors. The conversation highlights the potential implications of RMF technology in plasma physics and its broader applications.
Jdo300
Messages
548
Reaction score
5
Hello All,

I have had some interest in the effects of rotating magnetic fields and was doing some research on the subject when I came across the following paper published from the University of Washington:;

http://wsx.lanl.gov/Publications/RSI-RMF-Tobin-paper.pdf

The paper discusses some experiments involving a high power, high speed rotating magnetic field. I didn't read through the entire paper but there was one spot on the first page that really caught my attention:

"The Translation, Confinement and Sustainment (TCS) Experiment located at the Redmond Plasma
Physic Laboratory (RPPL) of the University of Washington was designed to apply, for the first time, a
rotating magnetic field (RMF) to a high-temperature field reversed configuration (FRC) plasma (Te ~ 100
eV and Ti ~ 300 eV) [1]. The RMF current drive technique is a special case of the more general j x B
current drive scheme, by which electrons are “pulled” along with the rotating magnetic field [2].
Unlike
inductive current drive systems, RMF current drive is steady state. The RMF is used for the purpose of
building up and sustaining the magnetic flux of the FRC. The exp erimental goal is to benchmark this
current drive technique against theoretical predictions, and to determine the robustness of the FRC plasma
to this external perturbation. An initial goal for the RMF system was to extend the lifetime of the FRC by a
factor of ~3; this goal has already been achieved with pulses lasting 1 ms. It was anticipated that a 1 ms
pulse would become limited by particle inventory rather than resistive flux losses. At present particle
inventory is not limiting lifetime, exactly why is not yet understood."


I am particularly interested in the part that I highlighted in boldface. I was wondering if anyone here may know anything about "rotating magnetic field current drive" systems, and how the J x B equations fits into this? I am very interested in learning more about this. Does it only apply to plasmas or could the effect take place in regular wires too?

Thank you,
Jason O
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Jason,

I'm not an expert on rotating magnetic fields, but I do know a bit about the J x B equations. The J x B equations are used to describe a current that is driven in a conductor by a changing magnetic field, which results in a force that is perpendicular to both the current and the magnetic field. This type of force can be used to drive the plasma contained in your experiment, which describes the rotation of the magnetic field. I'm not sure if this effect can be applied to regular wires, but it definitely applies to plasma.
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K