Does Ignorance Influence Voting Preferences?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RageSk8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ignorance Support
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the influence of ignorance on voting preferences, particularly in relation to political affiliation and education. Participants explore correlations between knowledge of political issues, such as Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, and support for candidates like George W. Bush and John Kerry. The conversation touches on the implications of media influence, educational background, and biases in information sources.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note a correlation between ignorance about WMD in Iraq and support for George W. Bush, suggesting that correcting misconceptions could benefit Democratic candidates.
  • Others argue that ignorance is not solely a lack of knowledge but may stem from consuming biased news sources, questioning the fairness of the information available to voters.
  • There are claims regarding the relationship between educational attainment and political affiliation, with some asserting that college graduates tend to vote Republican, while others suggest a negative correlation.
  • Participants discuss the potential liberalizing effect of education, with references to statistical trends indicating that higher education may correlate with more liberal views.
  • Some express skepticism about the validity of polls and the framing of questions, indicating a need for transparency in polling methodologies.
  • There are differing opinions on whether those with graduate degrees who vote Democratic primarily come from academia, with some expressing uncertainty about the broader implications of educational statistics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the influence of ignorance on voting preferences, with multiple competing views on the relationship between knowledge, education, and political affiliation remaining unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential biases in polling data, the definitions of ignorance and education, and the complexity of measuring political preferences across different demographics.

RageSk8
The poll also showed a correlation between people's ignorance and their political affiliation. Among those who believed WMD had been found in Iraq, 72 per cent said they would vote to re-elect Mr Bush in November and 23 per cent said they supported his Democratic challenger, John Kerry. Among those who knew that no WMD had been found,74 per cent supported Mr Kerry and 23 per cent backed the President.
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=514681

Democrats would benefit from a huge media campaign that focused only on correcting common misconceptions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ignorance is when you can't even punch holes through a card when you vote.

Democrats and republicans alike would benefit most from re-electing George W. Bush for another four glorious years.
 
Last edited:
Democrats and republicans alike would benefit most from re-electing George W. Bush for another four glorious years.

hahahahahahahahahahaha

But seriously, I am only making a single, undeniable point: Kerry would benefit if more Americans knew the facts about Iraq's WMD capabilities and (nonexistent) operational ties with al-Qa'ida. There is a strong correlation between ignorance on these issues and support for Bush.
 
I'm willing to bet that those most who have the most positive views of any particular politicians are more ignorant than those who view them with suspicion. The more than you know, the less (or at least the lower the percentage of total knowledge) that there is to like.

I also think that conservatives and right-wingers (I am not equating the two terms here, fyi), especially the of the social type (rather than just with regards to taxes and other financial matters), tend to be more ignorant of the world around them, content with and believing in the prejudices that their own particular surroundings imbue them with, instead of invoking their critical abilities as often as they should. I'm referring to the people that still refer to environmentalists as "hippies" and refer to liberals as "Commies" or support whatever military action their government makes wholeheartedly (at least, as long as it's a Republican).
 
I'm *Holding my nose* because there's something fishy smelling about this. I'd find it credible only after I had a chance to see the actual poll questions and results.
 
I'm watching this closely...I don't think it speaks to "ignorance" so much as getting your news from biased right-wing sources. Can you be blamed if you don't know you are being lied to?
 
Here you go kat: http://www.pipa.org/
There are two pdf files at the bottom of the page giving exactly what you want.
 
Although the journalist freely plagiarized from the report, he injected the term “ignorance”. The term was not used in the report. The report attributes Kay’s statement and those from other experts to be similar. That was not the case. The report does not refer to the financial interest of Clarke and Blix in book sales. A private company that has a leftist agenda and Canadian affiliations did the actual polling.

There is a high correlation with being a college graduate and voting republican.
 
GENIERE said:
There is a high correlation with being a college graduate and voting republican.

Yes, a negative correlation.
 
  • #10
Ragesk8- Thanks!
 
  • #11
GENIERE said:
There is a high correlation with being a college graduate and voting republican.

I don't think there is "high correlation", but I'll grant a statisical trend. Here is a http://transformer.cs.caltech.edu/archives/000029.html link that shows party affiliation (and the degree of affiliation) by educational level. By this survey, for voters with bachelor degrees Republicans have a slight but statistically relevant edge on Democrats. However, Democrats have a bigger edge over Republicans in voters with graduate level education. So, by the data, Democrats have more support in the polar ends of the educational spectrum and Republicans have more support in the middle. This is interesting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
Nice post Rage and good link.

I don't think there is "high correlation", but I'll grant a statisical trend. Here is a link link that shows party affiliation (and the degree of affiliation) by educational level. By this survey, for voters with bachelor degrees Republicans have a slight but statistically relevant edge on Democrats. However, Democrats have a bigger edge over Republicans in voters with graduate level education. So, by the data, Democrats have more support in the polar ends of the educational spectrum and Republicans have more support in the middle. This is interesting.

The Census Bureau supports your link. Data from 1996 election:

Grade school only --- 82% voted dem. vs. 18% rep.
High school --- 60% voted dem. vs. 40% rep.
College + --- 49% voted dem. vs. 51% rep.

That’s about as much as the CB broke it down.

It would be interesting to know if those holding graduate degrees and vote democratic are primarily from academia.
 
  • #13
It would be interesting to know if those holding graduate degrees and vote democratic are primarily from academia.

I doubt it, but I am not sure. Generally in statistics like these "graduate" includes masters, phd's, mba's, law degrees, Md's, etc. The majority of people with phd's (even in something like English) do not end up working in academia (because the market is very competitive and the economic pay out is comparatively small).
 
  • #14
In the most recent government class that I took, we had a book called American Government: Using MicroCase ExplorIt (with CD-ROM). It had a huge collection of data from at least the GSS, if not other surveys as well. The book discussed a "liberalizing effect" of education, and the statistics backed it up. According to the measures used, higher education increased liberality, and there was a positive correlation between the amount of time spent in college and the liberality of the populations. Positions on several key issues were used as indicators, and I think that party affiliation used, too.
 
  • #15
Marginally more marginal Republicans with Bachelor's degrees (1077R vs 995 D)
More Democrats with Master's degrees (466 cs 373)
 
  • #16
IQ by State:
http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~gcharter/iq.txt

:biggrin: :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #17
This site has been discussed on other forums. The author doesn't give any source for his numbers except to state they are based on Raven A.P.M. Given the amount of junk IQ stuff that exists on the web, I am leary.
 
  • #18
I see that New York is ranked 4th on the list. With the high percentage of blacks and hispanics in New York State it is nice to see that there has been a major improvement. The president's educational programs are starting to pay off!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 139 ·
5
Replies
139
Views
17K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 114 ·
4
Replies
114
Views
12K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K