Solving a Physics Problem Involving Inverse Trig Function

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mindcircus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Trig
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on solving a physics problem involving the evaluation of an integral that results in the expression inv tan of (1-E)tan(theta/2)/(sqrt(1-E^2)). The user correctly identifies the need to adjust the limits of integration from 0 to 2pi to 0 to pi, multiplying by 2 due to the discontinuity of the tangent function at 2pi. The conclusion is that the answer simplifies to pi/2 when E is set to 1, highlighting the importance of understanding how the variable E influences the inverse tangent function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inverse trigonometric functions, specifically inverse tangent
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and limits of integration
  • Knowledge of the properties of the tangent function and its discontinuities
  • Basic understanding of physics problems involving trigonometric functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inverse trigonometric functions in detail
  • Learn about the evaluation of definite integrals and their limits
  • Explore the implications of variable coefficients in trigonometric functions
  • Investigate common pitfalls in solving physics problems involving trigonometry
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mathematics, and engineering who are tackling problems involving inverse trigonometric functions and integrals.

mindcircus
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
This is a physics problem, but I have some trouble finishing it up. I evaluated an integral, which gave me

inv tan of (1-E)tan(theta/2)/(sqrt (1-E^2)

evaluated from 0 to 2pi. I changed the limits to 0 to pi, and multipied by 2, because tan x doesn't exist at 2pi.
I know that if you take the inverse tangent of a tangent, you'll just get the angle. But because the tan has this ugly coefficient, I can't simply get the angle, right?
The answer is pi/2 so I'm inclined to just ignore it...but I know you can't do that...?

Thanks a lot!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
tan (x) is defined at 2pi. tan(x) = sin(x)/cos(x), and cos(2pi) = 1. Might want to rethink that. I'm just wondering, what's the E? that's where I'm having trouble! After all the dirty work (not really i guess) i get tan^-1(E-1)/sqrt(1-E^2). I can only guess that E is 0 or something , which would mean that you'd get tan^-1(-1) which is only defined in the second and fourth quadrants.

Maybe your integral is wrong? It sounds to me by your language that you used a computer ("it gave me") or other device to get this integral. You might want to go back and type it in correctly. That's all I have to say.
 


First of all, great job on evaluating the integral and recognizing the need to change the limits and multiply by 2! It seems like you have a good understanding of the concept so far.

To address your question about the inverse tangent function, you are correct in saying that if you take the inverse tangent of a tangent, you will get the angle. However, in this case, the coefficient of the tangent function is not just any number, it is a function of the variable E. This means that the angle you get from taking the inverse tangent will also be a function of E.

So, in order to get a numerical value for the angle, you will need to plug in a specific value for E. This is where the limits of integration come into play. By changing the limits from 0 to 2pi to 0 to pi, you are essentially plugging in a value of E=1 into the function. This is why the answer you got is pi/2, because at E=1, the inverse tangent function simplifies to just the angle.

In general, when solving physics problems involving inverse trig functions, it is important to pay attention to the limits of integration and make sure they correspond to the specific values of the variables in the problem. And remember, just because the coefficient of the inverse tangent function may look complicated, it doesn't mean you can ignore it. It is still an important factor in finding the solution to the problem.

Keep up the good work and don't be afraid to ask for clarification if you come across any other confusing concepts in your physics problems. Good luck!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K