Why is the integral of ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## so divisive?

In summary, the conversation discusses the process of finding the function for the area between ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## and the ##x##-axis, specifically the definite integral ##\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt##. The individual attempts to find the antiderivative using WolframAlpha and Symbolab and the confusion and disagreement surrounding the result. It is eventually concluded that the integral can be expressed in a piecewise manner and that it is helpful to reduce ##x## to the interval ##[0, 2\pi]##.
  • #1
Saracen Rue
150
10
TL;DR Summary
Various sources give different answers to ##\arcsin(\sin(x))##, and none of them seem to actually be fully correct. Why is this the case, and is there an actual answer?
Initially, I was attempting to find the function which expresses the area under enclosed between the function ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## and the ##x##-axis (so technically I am looking for ##\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt## specifically, but got caught up on finding the general antiderivative).

This lead me to attempting to integrate ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## using WolframAlpha, which gave me ##x\arcsin\left(\sin\left(x\right)\right)-\frac{x^{2}}{2}\sec\left(x\right)\sqrt{\cos^{2}\left(x\right)}##. After a quick inspection of the function, it became clear that something just wasn't quite right. So, I graphed it against ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## and quickly saw that, which being accurate for the domain ##(-\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{\pi}{2})##, it wasn't at all accurate outside of that domain. I next used Symbolab to attempt to evaluate ##\int \arcsin(\sin(x)) dx## and it gave me the result ##\frac{\arcsin\left(\sin\left(x\right)\right)^{2}}{2}##. Again, this seems to be correct for the domain ##(-\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{\pi}{2})##, but not for ##(\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{3\pi}{2})##... but then it is correct for ##(\frac{3\pi}{2}, \frac{5\pi}{2})## but not for ##(\frac{5\pi}{2}, \frac{7\pi}{2})## and so on.

Honestly, this has kind of left me stumped. I tried watching several Youtube videos but they all either have one of the answers above or are just completely wrong in their entirety. Why is it that no one can seem to agree on what this indefinite integral should be? I can understand if there's no way to fully express it in terms of elementary functions, but why not say that? WolframAlpha and Symbolab will both say there's no standard solution for integrating something like ##x^x##, so why do they both confidently give incorrect or at very least only partially correct answers to this integral? At the very least they should tell you that the antiderivative is only valid over a certain domain.

Finally, if anyone can find a way to evaluate ##\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt## it would be greatly appreciated! Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Saracen Rue said:
Finally, if anyone can find a way to evaluate ##\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt## it would be greatly appreciated! Thank you for your time.
I don't understand your issue. Isn't ##\arcsin\left(\sin\left(t\right)\right)\equiv\sin^{-1}\left(\sin(t)\right)=t+2n\pi## (where ##n=0,\pm1,\pm2,\ldots##)? So doesn't your integral simply evaluate to ##\frac{1}{2}x^{2}+2n\pi x##? (Note that for ##n=0##, that's precisely the answer returned by both Wolfram Alpha and Symbolab.)
 
  • #3
renormalize said:
I don't understand your issue. Isn't ##\arcsin\left(\sin\left(t\right)\right)\equiv\sin^{-1}\left(\sin(t)\right)=t+2n\pi## (where ##n=0,\pm1,\pm2,\ldots##)? So doesn't your integral simply evaluate to ##\frac{1}{2}x^{2}+2n\pi x##? (Note that for ##n=0##, that's precisely the answer returned by both Wolfram Alpha and Symbolab.)
The ##\arcsin## function gives a value in the range ##[-\frac \pi 2, \frac \pi 2]##. So:

For ##0 \le t \le \frac \pi 2##, we have ##\arcsin(\sin t) = t##

For ##\frac \pi 2 \le t \le \frac {3\pi} 2##, we have ##\arcsin(\sin t) = \pi - t##

For ##\frac {3\pi} 2 \le t \le \frac {5\pi} 2##, we have ##\arcsin(\sin t) = t - 2\pi##

This is a sawtooth function, with period ##2\pi##.

It's not clear how you would describe the integral in terms of a single expression. The Wolfram answer works in each separate interval, but it's not going to work over the whole domain.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, Saracen Rue and Ibix
  • #4
Saracen Rue said:
Finally, if anyone can find a way to evaluate ##\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt## it would be greatly appreciated! Thank you for your time.
The simplest approach is to reduce ##x## to the interval ##[0, 2\pi]##. The integral is the same for any ##x + 2n\pi##. Then $$\int_{0}^{x} \arcsin(\sin(t)) dt = $$$$\frac{x^2}{2} \ (0 \le x \le \frac \pi 2)$$$$\pi x - \frac{x^2}{2} - \frac{\pi^2}{4} \ (\frac \pi 2 \le x \le \frac {3\pi} 2)$$$$\frac{x^2}{2} - 2\pi x +2\pi^2 \ (\frac {3\pi} 2 \le x \le 2\pi)$$
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

1. Why is the integral of ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## difficult to solve?

The integral of ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## is difficult to solve because it involves a composition of trigonometric functions, which can be challenging to integrate. Additionally, the inverse trigonometric function, ##\arcsin(x)##, is a non-elementary function, meaning it cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions like polynomials and exponentials.

2. Is there a simple formula for the integral of ##\arcsin(\sin(x))##?

No, there is no simple formula for the integral of ##\arcsin(\sin(x))##. However, there are certain techniques, such as substitution and integration by parts, that can be used to solve this integral.

3. Why is the integral of ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## considered controversial?

The integral of ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## is considered controversial because it can have multiple solutions depending on the range of values for x. This can lead to different answers and interpretations, causing confusion and debate among mathematicians.

4. Are there any real-world applications for the integral of ##\arcsin(\sin(x))##?

Yes, the integral of ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## has various applications in physics, engineering, and other fields. For example, it can be used to calculate the average power of an alternating current or the displacement of a particle undergoing simple harmonic motion.

5. Can the integral of ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## be solved using numerical methods?

Yes, the integral of ##\arcsin(\sin(x))## can be solved using numerical methods, such as the trapezoidal rule or Simpson's rule. These methods involve approximating the integral using a series of smaller calculations, making it easier to solve without a closed-form solution.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
354
  • Calculus
Replies
29
Views
724
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
180
  • Calculus
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top