Is a Spin 2 Particle the Key to Understanding Gravitons?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kurious
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles Spin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between spin 1 photons and the theoretical spin 2 graviton. It establishes that while two spin 1 photons can combine to form a system with total spin angular momentum, they do not create a single graviton, as single particle states must adhere to the irreducible representations of the Poincare group. Specifically, in four dimensions, helicity states of +/- 1 and +/- 2 are irreducible, while the combination of multiple photons results in a reducible representation under ISO(2). The conversation also touches on the transition between massless and massive representations, highlighting the complexities of visualizing gravitons compared to photons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spin 1 and spin 2 particles
  • Familiarity with the Poincare group and its representations
  • Knowledge of massless and massive particle representations in quantum field theory
  • Basic concepts of helicity in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Poincare group and its role in quantum field theory
  • Explore the concept of irreducible representations in particle physics
  • Learn about the properties of massless and massive particles in four-dimensional spacetime
  • Investigate the theoretical implications of gravitons in quantum gravity frameworks
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in particle physics and the theoretical foundations of gravitation.

kurious
Messages
633
Reaction score
0
If two spin 1 photons are put together so that the tips of their magnetic field vectors just touch one another ( the vector lines are all in the same plane), a particle results which looks the same when it is rotated through 180 degrees - a spin 2 particle.This is the spin a graviton is supposed to have.
Is this a graviton?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can construct systems of n photons in which the total spin angular momentum is any integer between -n and +n. This does not mean that single particle states with helicity n and -n are formed. A single particle state is defined as an irreducible representation of the little group of the Poincare group in whatever spacetime dimension you're considering. In 4 dimensions, the little group is ISO(2). A helicty +/- 1 states form an irreducible representation. A helicty +/- 2 states form an irreducible representation. Etc. Therefore, two photons together do not a graviton make.
The n photon system forms a reducible representation under ISO(2): n copies of helicty 1 states.

While we're here, a situation where we can construct single particle states from other single particle states can occur when you go between massless and massive representations. For example, the little group for massive states in 4D is SO(3). A massive spin 1 particle forms the 3 dimensional (irreducible) representation of that group. Under the little group for the massless states, ISO(2), the 3 rep breaks into a 2 and a 1. These are interpreted as a massless spin 1 particle and a scalar particle. This type of decomposition (in reverse) happens when we say a massless vector particle "eats" a scalar particle to become massive.
 
What do you think a graviton would be like then - I think we should be able to visualise what it is - we can visualise photons and atoms - so why should a graviton be so different? I agree that two photons do not a graviton make because two photons in a beam of light would then be a graviton! If the photons traveled faster than light, that would make them different - perhaps gravitons.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K