## maxwell's equations

Are Maxwell's equations thought to be exact? I realize this question is very open-ended and loosely-phrased.
 PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com >> Leading 3-D printer firms to merge in $403M deal (Update)>> LA to give every student an iPad;$30M order>> CIA faulted for choosing Amazon over IBM on cloud contract
 Yes they are. But keep in mind that each one of maxwell's equations inevitably contains some sort of fundamental constant (mu or epsilon usually; not to mention electric charge etc etc) which are measured quantities and therein not exact. Does that answer your question?
 Yes.

## maxwell's equations

They're not exactly exact. QED makes slightly different predictions from classical electromagnetism.
 Mathematically, correct hence exact. Physically, it's a good approximation and only an approximation to model phenomena. Hence not exact physically. Is anything exact physically? No.

 Quote by lzkelley Yes they are. But keep in mind that each one of maxwell's equations inevitably contains some sort of fundamental constant (mu or epsilon usually; not to mention electric charge etc etc) which are measured quantities and therein not exact.
lz, be careful.

which constant in Maxwell's equation is measured and not defined (to an exact value)?
 Epsilon-not. Mu-not is defined. At least, that's what my professor said.

 Quote by Poop-Loops Epsilon-not. Mu-not is defined. At least, that's what my professor said.
you mean this epsilon-not ?
 Blog Entries: 1 Recognitions: Gold Member Science Advisor Staff Emeritus And the magnetic constant?

 Quote by tgt Mathematically, correct hence exact. Physically, it's a good approximation and only an approximation to model phenomena. Hence not exact physically. Is anything exact physically? No.
I have one apple, I add another one, I have exactly two apples.

 Quote by dst I have one apple, I add another one, I have exactly two apples.
Well, if you take into account the masses of the apples, which is what is physically relevant when you buy apples, then you have less mass when the two apples are together, right ?

 Quote by humanino Well, if you take into account the masses of the apples, which is what is physically relevant when you buy apples, then you have less mass when the two apples are together, right ?

Pfft, technicalities. If truth be told, the error is in disguise - it's either present in the definition(s) or as a constant in whatever expression you're using.

On the other hand, there is no match for the physics of two cows™.

You have two communist cows.

Blog Entries: 47
Recognitions:
Gold Member
Homework Help
 Quote by Poop-Loops Epsilon-not. Mu-not is defined. At least, that's what my professor said.
by the way, that's
epsilon-naught (epsilon-zero) and similarly for mu-naught.

 Quote by humanino Well, if you take into account the masses of the apples, which is what is physically relevant when you buy apples, then you have less mass when the two apples are together, right ?
so, that applies, too, when two physicists get together?

 Quote by humanino Well, if you take into account the masses of the apples, which is what is physically relevant when you buy apples, then you have less mass when the two apples are together, right ?
Umm--what? Are you using special relativity?

 Quote by rewebster so, that applies, too, when two physicists get together?
I guess so
edit
Actually, it depends. If they disagree on the status of "is string a theory ?", their interaction can be very exothermic.
 Quote by ehrenfest Umm--what? Are you using special relativity?
They have gravitational biding energy, don't they ?

 Similar discussions for: maxwell's equations Thread Forum Replies Beyond the Standard Model 19 General Physics 21 General Physics 0 Introductory Physics Homework 2 Introductory Physics Homework 12