Peskin & Schroeder: Is it a Good First Time QFT Book?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the suitability of Peskin and Schroeder as a first-time textbook for Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and explores supplementary resources. Participants share their opinions on various QFT texts and their approaches to teaching the subject.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that Peskin and Schroeder is a good first QFT book due to its understandable approach and inclusion of exercises.
  • Others suggest that the book's approach, which avoids path integrals initially, makes it more accessible for beginners.
  • Several participants recommend supplementary texts such as Bailin and Love, Bjorken and Drell, and caution against using Mandl and Shaw.
  • Concerns are raised about Mandl and Shaw, with some participants stating it oversimplifies concepts and does not provide substantial learning.
  • One participant mentions the availability of excellent free online notes as an alternative resource for learning QFT.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the value of Mandl and Shaw, with some participants strongly advising against it while others do not express a clear opinion. The discussion reflects a variety of perspectives on the best resources for learning QFT.

Contextual Notes

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of various textbooks, highlighting the subjective nature of learning resources in QFT. The discussion does not resolve the debate over the best approach to teaching QFT or the merits of specific texts.

Norman
Messages
895
Reaction score
4
Hello all,

Just wondering if Peskin and Schroeder is a good first time QFT book? If so, what would be a good book to supplement it with?
Cheers,
Norm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
QFT books generally take one of two approaches. They either start with path integrals or they derive everything that they possibly can before introducing them. If you have never met a path integral before then the latter approach is usually easier. Peskin and Schroeder take this approach and I would say it is the most understandable book on the market for a first pass at the subject. It also has plenty of exercises, which you really need to get stuck into if you really want to understand the subject.

A random selection of other good books are Ryder (despite the lack of exercises), Kaku and the classic texts by Landau and Lifschitz.
 
I agree with slyboy, but I also suggest the excellent textbook by Bailin and Love. Don´t waste your time on Mandl and Shaw. The classic Bjorken and Drell is also a good choice for many parts. I don´t think one should follow one book only, but pick things here and there... Good hunting!
 
gnl said:
Don´t waste your time on Mandl and Shaw.

What is the bad thing with this book?
 
I think it over-simplifies things, and in the end of the day you don´t learn much. With Peskin and Schroeder plus Bjorken and Drell and Bailin and Love you certainly don´t need it.
 
gnl said:
I think it over-simplifies things, and in the end of the day you don´t learn much. With Peskin and Schroeder plus Bjorken and Drell and Bailin and Love you certainly don´t need it.

Ok, thanks. Just started reading it. Will maybe change...
 
It depends on the amount of time you have. Mind you, one can find also excellent notes on the web for free. One example:

http://www.lorentz.leidenuniv.nl/vanbaal/FTcourse.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K