Are homo sapiens a cybernetic life-form?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MonstersFromTheId
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    homo
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the concept of Homo sapiens as a cybernetic life-form, examining the relationship between humans and technology, particularly in terms of survival and evolution. Participants consider the implications of technological dependence and the potential future of humanity in relation to its machines.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant humorously suggests that Homo sapiens could be classified as a cybernetic life-form due to their reliance on technology for food production and distribution.
  • Another participant questions whether humanity could revert to subsistence agriculture, noting that some individuals already hunt for their food but still depend on technology like freezers.
  • A different participant agrees with the idea of becoming more robotic, referencing the character "Robbie" and discussing the implications of technological dependence on survival.
  • One participant asserts that humans are already akin to "ambulatory internal combustion engines," emphasizing the historical development of technology and the complexity of human existence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether humanity is already a cybernetic life-form or if it is an inevitable future. There is no consensus on the implications of technological dependence or the potential for a return to simpler forms of living.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the future of humanity and technology, as well as varying definitions of what constitutes a cybernetic life-form. The complexity of human-machine interactions remains unresolved.

MonstersFromTheId
Messages
142
Reaction score
1
:wink:
Homo sapiens:
A cybernetic life-form, native to the third planet from a medium sized star.
Primary food sources:
Petroleum oil
Ferrous metals
Water
Trace amounts of organic material
:wink:

O.k. so I'm kidding, but only partly.
Consider; how many of us would starve without the technology we use to produce, store, and distribute, the food required to keep the billions of us there are alive?
What do you suppose we consume more of as a species - wheat, or oil? Steel or beef? Water or toilet paper?
I really don't know myself, I don't even know where I'd go to find out, or even how something like that should be counted. But I do strongly suspect that without the massive monocultures of wheat tended and harvested by fairly complex machines, the trucks and highways that form what at this point really could be viewed as a massive circulatory system, without the warehouses, and the telecommunications used to determine what winds up where and when,.. there'd be a hell of a lot fewer of us.

So the question becomes - at what point does making distinctions between ourselves and our technology become a more or less meaningless distinction in classifying our species?
...
Over the long pull, how many of you believe that it's pretty much inevitable that humanity probably is going to wind up a truly cybernetic life-form?

How many think we're already there?

Monsters
 
Biology news on Phys.org
So we're all going to turn into Robbies? (I do love your handle!)

If we could stand to lose 99.9% of us we could go back to subsistence agriculture any time. Or hunting - some people do that already. Up in my neck of the woods there are individual bowhunters whose entire yearly protein comes from their kill. Of course they depend on freezers - hence on electricity...
 
selfAdjoint said:
So we're all going to turn into Robbies?

:biggrin:
Clickity-click-click-CLACK!
Yes sir. That possibility would be consistent with all rellevant parameters likely to effect the evolutionary development path currently observed sir.
:biggrin:

:wink: "Robbie" STILL, to this very day, gets my vote as the best dammed robot character film ever produced.
...
"Of course they depend on freezers - hence on electricity..."
But even without freezers it probably wouldn't take 'em long to start smoking or salting the meat you know?
Maybe those people are nature's way of takin out insurance on this whole monkey with too big a brain come cyborg experiment. ;-)
"Never bet more than you can afford to loose?"

Monsters
 
We are already, ambulatory internal combustion engines. We made the first simple batteries in the Babylonian era, that we know of. We made the first simple engines because we could not even come close to understanding the complexity of the engines we are. We created engines to serve our engines, we are gifted with this physical interface form, well yet, beyond our understanding.

We have not grasped some of the most fundamental aspects of our tenure here, so it represents no evolution to change into less complex machines, simply because we don't understand ourselves.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
7K
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K