Can This Mathematical Permutation Problem Be Generalized for Any 4n Terms?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dapet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the optimal permutation of the numbers 1 through 40 to maximize the expression x_1 + x_2 / x_3 - x_4 * x_5 + x_6 / x_7 - x_8 * x_9 + ... + x_38 / x_39 - x_40. The participants confirm that the maximum value can be achieved through a specific arrangement of terms, and this can be generalized for any 4n terms. Key findings include that the maximum occurs when the largest numbers are placed in the numerators of fractions, while the minimum occurs with a specific arrangement of products. The generalization is proven through mathematical induction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical permutations and combinations
  • Familiarity with mathematical induction techniques
  • Knowledge of basic arithmetic operations and their properties
  • Ability to analyze and construct mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study mathematical induction proofs in detail
  • Explore advanced permutation techniques in combinatorial mathematics
  • Learn about optimization problems in mathematics
  • Investigate the properties of arithmetic operations in expressions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying combinatorial optimization, and anyone interested in advanced mathematical problem-solving techniques.

dapet
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Determine the permutation (x_1,x_2,...,x_40) of numbers 1,2,...,40 such that the expression x_1 + x_2 / x_3 - x_4 * x_5 + x_6 / x_7 - x_8 * x_9 + ... + x_38 / x_39 - x_40
has the maximal possible value. (the operators +,/,-,* alternate regularly.) It can be generalized for 4n (where n is an arbitrary natural)?

But I must confess, that I have a lot of problems with the simpler task... I think that more than one permutation give the same maximum. I have one suggestion, but I can't prove that it belongs to the best of all.
It's based on:
let (a,b,c,d,e,f) be a permution of (1,2,3,4,5,6)
minimum of ab + cd + ef occurs for 6*1 + 2*5 + 3*4
maximum of a/b + c/d + e/f occrus for 6/1 + 5/2 + 4/3
But the generalization...

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that the maximum looks like:
40+(39/20)+(38/21)+...(30/29)-(1*18)-(2*17)-...-(10*9)-19 and the generalization is (according to my opinion) similar... It's easy to prove that numbers 40,39,...,30 must be in numerators of fractions for reach the maximum, but I don't know how to prove that the "position" of other numbers as optimal as possible for reach the maximum...

Thanks for each help that I really need.
 


Your approach seems to be on the right track. In fact, you have found a permutation that gives the maximum value for 6 terms, and this can be extended to any number of terms. For the generalization, we can use the same logic as you did for 6 terms, but we need to consider the pattern for 4n terms.

Let (a,b,c,d) be a permutation of (1,2,3,4)
Minimum of ab + cd occurs for 4*1 + 2*3
Maximum of a/b + c/d occurs for 4/1 + 3/2

So, for 8 terms, we have:
Minimum of ab + cd + ef + gh occurs for 4*(1+5) + 2*(3+7)
Maximum of a/b + c/d + e/f + g/h occurs for 4/(1+5) + 3/(3+7)

Similarly, for 12 terms, we have:
Minimum of ab + cd + ef + gh + ij + kl occurs for 4*(1+5+9) + 2*(3+7+11)
Maximum of a/b + c/d + e/f + g/h + i/j + k/l occurs for 4/(1+5+9) + 3/(3+7+11)

This pattern can be generalized for any number of terms, where the minimum will occur for the sum of the first n/2 terms and the maximum will occur for the sum of the first n/2 terms divided by the sum of the last n/2 terms.

So, for 40 terms, we have:
Minimum of ab + cd + ... + yz occurs for 4*(1+5+...+37) + 2*(3+7+...+39)
Maximum of a/b + c/d + ... + y/z occurs for 4/(1+5+...+37) + 3/(3+7+...+39)

This gives us a permutation of (1,2,...,40) that will give the maximum value for the given expression. However, as you mentioned, there may be multiple permutations that give the same maximum value. This can be proven using mathematical induction.

Therefore, the generalization for 4n terms holds true and your approach is correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K