C++ code not compiling correctly

  • Context: C/C++ 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Benzoate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    C++ Code
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion addresses compilation errors in C++ code related to the quadratic formula. The primary issues identified include the incorrect use of "count" instead of "cout" and the need to include the "using namespace std;" directive or prefix standard library functions with "std::". Additionally, it is recommended to use the library instead of for better compatibility with the standard namespace. The corrected code is provided, demonstrating proper syntax and library usage.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of C++ syntax and structure
  • Familiarity with standard input/output streams in C++
  • Knowledge of C++ standard libraries, specifically and
  • Basic understanding of the quadratic formula and its implementation in programming
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between and in C++
  • Learn about the implications of using "using namespace std;" in C++ programming
  • Explore best practices for error handling and debugging in C++
  • Study advanced C++ features such as templates and namespaces for better code organization
USEFUL FOR

C++ developers, programming students, and anyone troubleshooting compilation errors in C++ code.

Benzoate
Messages
418
Reaction score
0
I'm pretty sure I wrote the correct code for the quadratic formula and yet Dev-C++ continues to find a problem with my code. I will post the code I've written:



#include<iostream.hpp>
#include<math.h>

int main()
{
double root1,root2,a,b,c,root;

count << "Enter the coefficients a,b,c: "; ! This is the line where Dev-C++ finds an error
cin >> a >> b >> c;
root=sqrt(b*b-4.0*a*c);
root1=.5*(root-b)/a;
root2=-.5*(root-b)/a;
count << "The solutions are " <<root1 << " and " <<root2 << "\n";

return(0);

}
 
Technology news on Phys.org
You need either std::count or put a "using namespace std" declaration at the top.
 
You might want to try the C++ math library instead:

#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;

I found this here. You might want to glance over it.
http://forums.devshed.com/c-programming-42/using-std-namespace-what-does-it-mean-45679.html
 
As others have pointed out, there are a couple of mistakes. First, functions such as cout, cin, and so on belong to the standard namespace in C++. So if you want to use them in your code you need to do one of two things. The first option is to precede every call to these functions with a declaration that they're from the standard namespace, i.e., instead of

Code:
cout << "This is some text..." << endl;

you should have

Code:
std::cout << "This is some text..." << std::endl;

However, typing std:: each time you call a function from the C++ standard library is cumbersome. Therefore, you can save time by using the following as a preprocessor directive in your code:

Code:
using namespace std;

Typically, you should declare all of the parts of the standard library that your code needs and then include "using namespace std;" on the next line.

The other difficulty is that you should use the cmath library instead of the math library. Both are essentially identical apart from the fact that cmath allows its members to be placed in the standard namespace. So your code should really look like this:

Code:
#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>

int main()
{
  double root1,	root2, a, b, c,	root;

  cout << "Enter the coefficients a, b, c: " <<	endl;
  cin  >> a >> b >> c;

  root = sqrt (b*b - 4.0*a*c);
  root1 =	.5*(root - b) / a;
  root2 =	-.5*(root - b) / a;
  cout << "The solutions are:" << endl
       << "root1 = " <<	root1  << endl
       << "root2 = " <<	root2
       << endl;

  return 0;
}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K