| Thread Closed |
Partial sum of Fourier Coefficients |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jun10-08, 08:17 PM | #1 |
|
|
Partial sum of Fourier Coefficients
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
f (x) = 0 -pi<x<0 x^2 0<x<pi Find the fourier series and use it to show that (pi^2)/6=1+1/2^2+1/3^2+... 2. Relevant equations N/A 3. The attempt at a solution I was able to find the fourier series and my answer matched with the back of the book. But I don't understand how I am supposed to use it to prove the expansion of pi^2/6 . I tried plugging in (pi^2)/6 for f(x) but that didn't work out. Thanks! 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data 2. Relevant equations 3. The attempt at a solution |
| Jun10-08, 10:13 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
What do you find to be the fourier series for f(x)?
|
| Jun10-08, 10:26 PM | #3 |
Recognitions:
|
Just to echo nicksauce, if you found the fourier series as you said, what is it?
|
| Jun10-08, 11:18 PM | #4 |
|
|
Partial sum of Fourier Coefficients
I didn't want to type out the fourier series since I am really new to latex but here it is
f(x) =pi^2/6 +[tex]\Sigma[/tex] { (2(-1)^n/n^2) cos nx + ((-1)^(n+1) pi/n + 2/(pi * n^3) [(-1)^n-1] sin nx } I hope that made sense and that I didn't make any typos. |
| Jun10-08, 11:19 PM | #5 |
|
|
P.S: and n goes from 1 to infinity
|
| Jun10-08, 11:47 PM | #6 |
Recognitions:
|
Thanks. Since the mean value of the function over the interval is pi^2/6, I was hoping I could just say put x=0. But you've got that alternating sign and factor of 2 in the cosine part. Are you sure of the series? Otherwise, I'll have to work it out. Didn't want to do that.
|
| Jun11-08, 10:37 AM | #7 |
|
|
I am pretty sure about the series. I verified with the back of the book. We were also supposed to show pi^2/12=1-1/2^2+ etc. I plugged in x=o and was able to prove it.
For the pi^2/6, I tried setting x to be pi/2 so that the cosine term goes away but that didn't work out. |
| Jun11-08, 11:13 AM | #8 |
Recognitions:
|
It looks to me like you should be putting x=pi. That turns cos(nx) into (-1)^n makes the sin(nx) vanish. I'm trying to check your series. I get something a lot like it. But I can't seem to get all the parts quite right. Guess I'm not very good at this...
|
| Jun11-08, 11:36 AM | #9 |
Recognitions:
|
Doh. I've been being stupid. Regarded as a periodic function f(x) is discontinuous at x=pi. The series doesn't converge to f(pi). It converges to (f(pi)+f(-pi))/2. Or pi^2/2. Do you know why? Now try x=pi in your series.
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Partial sum of Fourier Coefficients
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Fourier Coefficients | Differential Equations | 3 | ||
| [SOLVED] Fourier coefficients | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| Fourier Coefficients | Calculus | 1 | ||
| understanding of the fourier coefficients..? | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 2 | ||
| Calculating Fourier Coefficients | Advanced Physics Homework | 2 | ||