
#1
Jun1508, 10:29 PM

P: 231

Does anyone know what the most powerful machine ever constructed might be, say in terms of energy produced?
I've heard it is the Saturn V rocket, but I'm willing to bet one of the existing particle accelerators could surpass that. Anyone? 



#3
Jun1508, 11:09 PM

P: 2,828

You need to define properly the "power" you are after. Particle accelerators run on electricity, and do not reach such high power consumption as you might imagine, because in the end the problem is not so much to burn as much power as possible, but to impart the energy in the particles accelerated. Most of the energy at the LHC for instance will be stored in the magnetic fields, not in the beams of particles, and is of the order of several GJ. I think you are right when saying this is more than the energy developed by Saturn V, although this is counter intuitive to me. I did some rough estimation, because the exact dynamics would require more data than I found. In any case, this must be way less than the several MT developed by some nuclear weapons, which are of the order of millions of GJ. That would be the most powerful machines ever constructed, although the energy is merely released and not controlled, which could be considered pretty useless.




#4
Jun1508, 11:15 PM

Mentor
P: 21,999

Most powerful machine ever constructed?
You said energy  did you mean power? The Saturn V (stage 1) produced 141,000 MW of power  but only for about 2.5 minutes. Or 5,900 MWh. A typical nuclear reactor puts out 1,000 MW. So a Saturn V first stage put out as much energy in 2.5 minutes as a nuclear plant does in 6 hours.




#6
Jun1508, 11:49 PM

P: 2,828

So, a good reference in terms of huge amounts of energy would be the total kinetic energy of the Earth in rotation around the Sun. I did not check, wikipedia gives [tex]2.6\times 10^{29}[/tex] J. How many hours of a typical nuclear plant ? 



#7
Jun1608, 12:00 AM

P: 248

Wow a gigaJoule!




#8
Jun1608, 05:36 AM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 6,238

If we go for power, and humanmade, then I think that a thermonuclear bomb wins the contest. A megaton is 4.184 petajoules (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiloton ), your typical thermonuclear weapon is a 1020 megaton (although the Soviets made a 100 megaton banger), so we are talking about 100 petajoules, or ~ 10^17 joule. The energydelivering explosion itself takes about 10 microseconds (this is an educated guess of mine, given that that's about the time it takes for the shock wave to reach the thermonuclear part and hence blow it apart).
So we are talking here of a 10^22 Watt device  which, granted, doesn't work a long time. 



#10
Jun1608, 10:40 AM

P: 465





#11
Jun1608, 10:50 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 8,961




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Transporting machine(actually cloning machine)  General Discussion  15  
Is logic ultimately constructed on faith?  General Discussion  37  
5point Gaussian Quadrature using constructed approximant in Matlab  Math & Science Software  1  
how much powerful is an accelerator  High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics  3  
Is God all that Powerful?  General Discussion  32 