How Would Reversing Water's Meniscus Affect Its Surface Properties?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Meniscus
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores how reversing the meniscus of water might affect its surface properties, including sound propagation, fountaining, breaking waves, ripples, buoyancy, suspensiveness, cavitation, bubbling, and boundary conditions. The scope includes theoretical implications and conceptual clarifications regarding fluid dynamics and surface tension phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the surface properties of water would change if its meniscus were reversed, listing various phenomena that could be affected.
  • Another participant notes that the curvature of the meniscus is influenced by the wettability of the interface material, suggesting that a concave meniscus occurs with wetting materials and a convex meniscus with non-wetting materials.
  • A different participant points out that mercury has an inverted meniscus, indicating that the properties of the interface material are not the sole factor in determining meniscus shape.
  • One participant seeks clarification on whether only boundary conditions are impacted by the reversal of the meniscus.
  • Another participant states that the meniscus shape is an adhesive phenomenon and discusses the role of van der Waals forces in determining the meniscus form based on particle interactions.
  • A participant provides an analogy regarding the shape of the meniscus in relation to minimizing volume, suggesting that the form is influenced by the interactions between water particles and the recipient material.
  • A later reply expresses appreciation for a visual explanation provided by another participant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the factors influencing meniscus shape and its implications for surface properties. No consensus is reached regarding the specific effects of reversing the meniscus on the listed phenomena.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of adhesive forces and particle interactions, as well as the dependence of meniscus shape on the properties of the interface material. Some mathematical or physical principles remain unresolved.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
All else being unchanged, how would the surface properties (sound propagation, fountaining, breaking waves, ripples, bouyancy, suspensiveness, cavitation, bubbling, boundary conditions, etc.) of water differ if its meniscus were reversed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doesn't the curvature of the meniscus depend on the wetability of the interface material? If the material wets the meniscus is concave, if it is non wetting the meniscus is convex.
 
Mercury has an inverted meniscus, it isn't just the properties of the interface material.
 
So you all are saying that of the phenomena on my list only the boundary conditions are affected?
 
The sense of the meniscus is an adhesive phenomenon.
 
If you want to put a volume in the minimum space, you have to use a sphere That is why the form of the meniscus is convex or concave, the particles don't want to be in the interphase of water and air.

The form of the meniscus depends on van der waals forces, that is, the interaction between particles. If the interaction between a particle of water and a particle of recipient is strong than the interaction between water itself, then the water rises and the meniscus is convex. Alcohol does exact the same, but mercury for example, not.

MiGUi
 
Interesting, MiGUi. A good visual.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K