Mass, energy problem in relativity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a \pi+ meson created in the Earth's atmosphere, with a focus on its energy and disintegration altitude. The context is rooted in the principles of relativity, particularly concerning energy conservation and time dilation effects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the meson's velocity and its displacement, with one participant noting a discrepancy in their approximation of the altitude. There is a suggestion to consider time measurements from the Earth's frame of reference, raising questions about the implications of relativistic effects on time and distance.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the calculations involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to convert time measurements to the observer's frame, but there is no consensus on the correct approach or values used in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of relativistic speeds on their calculations, particularly concerning the accuracy of their values for velocity and gamma. There is a noted concern about rounding errors and the precision of intermediate steps in their calculations.

zimo
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A [tex]\pi[/tex]+ meson whose rest energy is 140 MeV is created 100km above sea level in the Earth's atmosphere. The pi+ meson has a total energy of 1.5X10^5 MeV and is moving vertically downward. If it disintegrates 2x10^-8 s after it's creation as determined in its own frame of reference, at what altitude above sea level does the disintegration occur?


Homework Equations


energy conservation.

The Attempt at a Solution


I used energy const. to get the velocity of the particle, then attempted to calculate it's displacement which is approximately 6 km and I get approx. 94 km.
the correct answer is given to be 93.6, which is not a small error in my opinion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like you did the right thing, coming so close to the answer. Also, you say you got "approx. 94" while it should be 93.6, so how approx is your approx :smile: Did you round (too much) in intermediate steps?

If that doesn't help, please post your calculation.
 
I came down to V=0.9999c
since x=V*t=0.9999c*2*10^-8=~5.99524958
so 100-x is ~94.0047504
maybe the time is need to be measure relative to the Earth frame of reference or something?
e.g. t(earth)=gamma*2x10^-8, where gamma=1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
 
Hi zimo,
zimo said:
maybe the time is need to be measure relative to the Earth frame of reference or something?
e.g. t(earth)=gamma*2x10^-8, where gamma=1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
Exactly. You have to "convert" the time to the observer's referential (i.e. Earth referential) , since the distance is measured in the latter.

Cheers!
 
BenjF said:
Exactly. You have to "convert" the time to the observer's referential (i.e. Earth referential) , since the distance is measured in the latter.

but gamma=~70.712 so Earth time is 0.00000141424891
so the total distance is 0.9999c*0.00000141424891=423.938 ...

what is going on!? :confused:
 
Your value of gamma is not correct. You haven't probably kept enough decimals in V.
 
BenjF said:
Your value of gamma is not correct. You haven't probably kept enough decimals in V.

These are my steps to get gamma:

by definition: gamma=1 / sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
1 / sqrt(1 - 0.9999^2) = 1/ 0.014141782 =~ 70.712
 
Your definition of gamma is correct, and so are your steps to calculate it, but I wonder how you have exactly derived V. This value of V/c=0.9999 seems a bit too small for me.
 
please, help me here, I'm feeling lost... would you mind?
 
  • #10
zimo said:
These are my steps to get gamma:

by definition: gamma=1 / sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
1 / sqrt(1 - 0.9999^2) = 1/ 0.014141782 =~ 70.712

Why are you using a rather approximate v to compute gamma? Didn't you use gamma to find v to begin with? How DID you get v?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K