Finding voltage on circuit, help

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Iyafrady
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Voltage
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the voltage V in a circuit involving resistors and a dependent current source. Participants explore various methods for analyzing the circuit, including nodal and mesh analysis, while addressing issues related to voltage polarity and current direction.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a calculation using Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) but arrives at a different voltage than expected from the textbook, leading to confusion about the application of passive sign convention (psc).
  • Another participant questions the clarity of the dependent current source in the circuit, suggesting that it may need to be interpreted differently.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of consistent voltage polarity across resistors, especially when they are in parallel, and suggests combining resistors to simplify the analysis.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of assigning voltage polarities arbitrarily, with a participant arguing that incorrect assignments can lead to nonsensical results in current flow calculations.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the consequences of incorrectly assigning voltage polarities in series resistors.
  • Another participant explains that the potential drop is positive if current enters the positive node and emphasizes the need to ensure correct current direction before determining voltage drops.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the assignment of voltage polarities and the implications for current flow. There is no consensus on the best approach to resolve the discrepancies in voltage calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding of voltage polarity assignments and the potential for confusion when applying KCL and other analysis techniques. The discussion reflects various assumptions about circuit behavior that remain unresolved.

Iyafrady
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I want to find the voltage V, the red pencil is what is given in the problem and the blue pencil is what i did.I labeled the voltage polarity across the resistors to follow the psc.I first did KCL on the right most node; (V/100)+(V/10)+(-V/25)+.2V=2.5, I solve for v and get V=9.26, but the answer in the book is V=50..dont know what I am doing wrong, the book and my prof. always say to follow the psc convention whenever possible, especially on passive elements like resistors!:confused:
 

Attachments

  • circuit.jpg
    circuit.jpg
    11.8 KB · Views: 448
Physics news on Phys.org
There's something unclear here. There's a 0.2V1 dependent current source on the 2nd horizontal wire. But V1 is marked nowhere on the diagram, so is it to be interpreted as V instead?
 
oh yea sorry, .2V1 should be .2V
 
Last edited:
Iyafrady said:
I labeled the voltage polarity across the resistors to follow the psc.I first did KCL on the right most node; (V/100)+(V/10)+(-V/25)+.2V=2.5, I solve for v and get V=9.26, but the answer in the book is V=50..dont know what I am doing wrong, the book and my prof. always say to follow the psc convention whenever possible, especially on passive elements like resistors!:confused:
I'm guessing the reason why this doesn't work is because the current isn't flowing the same direction as that indicated by the voltage polarities. Remember that current can be negative (in the other direction), and you writing +- for the 10 and 100ohms branch whereas the top resistor has -+. Note that the node voltages for the right-side of the circuit are the same, as can be said for the left side. So, by writing -+ on top, and -+ below, you are in effect saying the voltage drop or (increase) are different between the right and left sides depending on which "level" of the circuit, which isn't the case.

One way to solve it is to combine all the parallel resistors into an equivalent resistance, noting that the potential across it is still -+. Then add up the two current sources (they are flowing between the same nodes so it's possible) to get an equivalent current source to get a simplified circuit with only one loop. You would then be able to find V.
 
Is it wrong to think that since the given polarity of the 25ohm resistor is already defined, i should follow the same convention on all the other resistors in which polarity is not defined?..And of course have the current entering the same "terminal" of the resistor?
 
If the polarity of the resistor is already defined, and if all the elements are in parallel, then you should duplicate the polarity on all the parallel branches.

What I'll do if I were you is to forget all those stuff about assigning voltage polarities and either apply nodal analysis or mesh analysis, or as I suggested earlier combining equivalent resistance. The problem with assigning voltage polarities is that it cannot be done so arbitrarily. Imagine if you have two resistors in series and you arbitrarily decide to assign +- on one and -+ on the other. What does that say about the current flow?
 
uhmm, what does that say about current flow??...i don't know.
 
Well according to the rule where potential drop is considered positive if current is entering +ve node and negative otherwise, we have the potential drop across both resistors (assume they have same R for simplicity) IR - IR = 0 which of course is nonsensical since the voltage drop across resistors in series adds up, not cancel out each other. You have to be sure that the current is indeed flowing in that direction before you know whether you should add or substract potential drops. Which is why I don't bother with this arbitrary V polarity assignments and instead make use of the nodal/mesh analysis techniques directly.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K