What is the most accurate method for measuring 6 mL of water?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the most accurate method for measuring 6 mL of water, comparing a graduated cylinder, pipet, and buret. The pipet is considered the most convenient and accurate due to its ability to control flow and lower percent error, while the graduated cylinder is deemed the least convenient because of difficulty in dispensing excess water. Participants discuss the significance of accuracy and calibration, noting that the graduated cylinder has a larger error margin compared to the more precise buret and pipet, which are graduated in 0.1 mL increments. The conversation also touches on the importance of understanding terms like "to contain" and "to deliver" in relation to the accuracy of the measurements. Overall, the pipet is favored for both convenience and accuracy in measuring small volumes of liquid.
iconwin
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Can anyone please tell me which one of the following is the most accurate method of Volume measurement for 6 mL of water (density= 1g/mL): Graduated Cylinder, Pipet, or Buret. Also, how can you explain your answer. Every help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you ever measured volume using these methods? Or have you at least seen them used? Neglecting accuracy for a moment - which will be the most convenient? Why? Which will be the least convenient? Why?

And I am not asking about some theoretical stuff, but about your gut feelings.
 
Borek said:
Have you ever measured volume using these methods? Or have you at least seen them used? Neglecting accuracy for a moment - which will be the most convenient? Why? Which will be the least convenient? Why?

And I am not asking about some theoretical stuff, but about your gut feelings.


First, thank you for replying my question. Secondly, I think the pipet will be the most convenient method because we can control the flowing of water easily with the wheel. The cylinder will be the least convenient because it hard to dispense the extra water if we overpour water in it. So , I think the Pipet should be the most accurate measuring method because it yield the least percent of error.

If I were wrong, please tell me. Thanks again!
 
Last edited:
Are you familiar with the terms "to contain" and "to deliver"? (and why would that be relevant?) Is the graduated cylinder graduated in 0.1 mL increments? Is the pipette even graduated at all? Is the pipette calibrated to contain a particular volume? (ie. is it a volumetric pipette?) Are the buret's graduations in 0.1 mL increments?
 
chemisttree said:
Are you familiar with the terms "to contain" and "to deliver"? (and why would that be relevant?) Is the graduated cylinder graduated in 0.1 mL increments? Is the pipette even graduated at all? Is the pipette calibrated to contain a particular volume? (ie. is it a volumetric pipette?) Are the buret's graduations in 0.1 mL increments?

Hi,
I think I can distinguish between the terms "to contain" and "to deliver" :) The graduated cylinder graduated in 1.0 mL increments (error: +/- 0.5mL), and both buret and pipette are graduated in 0.1 mL (error: +/- 0.05mL).
 
At this moment you may safely assume that one of these devices is less acurate. Honestly, I am not sure if anything more can be done (that's assuming that you are right about +/- 0.05 mL error, that's not necesarilly true; it may depend on particular glass).
 
It will also depend on the classification of the volumetric glassware and the temperature etc

Class A glassware is produced to tighter (volumetric) controls than class B glassware. these
 
Thanks to all!
 
Back
Top