Register to reply 
Advanced calculus proof 
Share this thread: 
#1
Sep1208, 09:28 PM

P: 7

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Prove that: ⋂_(n=1)^∞▒〖(0,1/n]=∅〗 2. Relevant equations If tried with mathematical induction, we would need to know the procedure follows: This would be my P(n) statement: ⋂_(n=1)^∞▒〖(0,1/n]=∅〗 now we would need to find out if P(1) is true and then assume P(k) for some k[tex]\geq[/tex]1, is true. Then we would need to prove the statement P(k+1) is also true. 3. The attempt at a solution I tried using induction, but our professor, nor the book explained any examples that actually go to infinity, all we covered and proved with induction has been up to "n". Thus my thinking consists of taking the semiintervals: a) (0,1/1]∩(0,1/2]=(0,1/2] so it continues for even smaller semiintervals, and the intersection between a bigger semiinterval with a larger semiinterval is the smaller of the two...up to the point of having (0,1/(huge nr close to ∞)]∩(0,1/∞]=(0,1/∞]=(0,0] The only thing I cannot explain is since this semiinterval contains zero, how can it be an empty set? So if someone could give me an idea or a hint, anything at all, I would appreciate it a lot! emira 


#2
Sep1208, 10:29 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,251

What you want to prove is that for any x in the reals, x is not in the intersection of (0,1/n] for all n. So all you have to do is given x, find an n such that (0,1/n] does not contain x.



#3
Sep1208, 10:41 PM

P: 7

What does x as a real number have to do with it though? what we have to prove is that the infinite intersection of this semiintervals that get smaller and smaller, is an empty set.
plus how could i prove that x is not an element of the small interval, and how does that help me into proving what i have to prove? 


#4
Sep1208, 10:53 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,251

Advanced calculus proof
If x<=0 it isn't in any of the intervals, so it's not in the intersection. If x>0 can you show there is an n such that 1/n<x? If so then it isn't in (0,1/n] so it's not in the intersection. I assumed you were working over the reals. The rationals are ok too. Pick an integer n greater than 1/x. If n>1/x then x>1/n, right?



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Advanced Calculus  Calculus  8  
Advanced Calculus proof  Calculus  4  
Advanced Calculus Proof  Calculus  4  
Advanced calculus  Advanced Physics Homework  4  
Advanced calculus  General Math  3 