Probability of a coincidence - question

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter musicgold
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    coincidence Probability
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the probability of receiving a phone call from a person one has recently thought about, as presented in the book "200% of Nothing" by A K Dewdney. Participants analyze the mathematical reasoning behind this phenomenon, exploring different approaches to calculating the probabilities involved over a specified time period.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines an approach using a decision tree to calculate the probability of receiving a call from someone thought of in the last minute, arriving at a probability of 0.00001 per call, leading to a total of 0.38 over 10 years.
  • Another participant agrees with the initial calculations but suggests that the expected number of such calls could be lower than anticipated, citing that some individuals may receive multiple calls, thus affecting the overall probability.
  • A later reply discusses the implications of averaging outcomes in probability, using the example of rolling dice to illustrate how some individuals may experience more than the average number of occurrences.
  • One participant questions the clarity of a previous statement regarding the expected number of calls, seeking further explanation.
  • Another participant suggests considering the unique combinations of people thought of and called, implying that the probability for a day is much smaller than the author's conclusion of 0.52.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct probability calculations, with multiple competing views presented regarding the assumptions and methods used to derive the probabilities.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the assumptions made about the frequency and duration of thoughts about friends, as well as the distribution of calls received. The discussion highlights the complexity of calculating probabilities in this context and the potential for varying interpretations of the problem.

musicgold
Messages
303
Reaction score
19
Hi,

I have been reading the book "200% of Nothing" by A K Dewdney, which explains various math abuses experienced in the real life. One of the examples explains the math behind a so called telepathy incidence; a coincidence in which, one gets the phone call from the very person whom she was thinking about just a minute ago. I am not able to get the final answer provided by the author. Can you please check my approach to the problem?

The example goes something like this: Suppose, for example, that you know 200 people (family, friends and colleagues) well enough to find yourself thinking about each of them occasionally. Suppose that you think about 10 of those people per day and two of them call you each day on average. The calls could come at any time during those 16 waking hours. Now, when the phone rings, the probability of one of those 10 people, about whom you thought about during the day has called, is 10/200 or 0.05. Now, the probability that the call is from someone you thought of in the previous minute is 1/960 or 0.0001, where 960 is the number of minutes in 16 waking hours. Although the chances of having such a call on a particular day are very small, if we consider a period of 10 years, i.e. 3650 days, the probability over this period climbs to 0.52 (the final answer.)

Now, this is how I approached the problem: I used a decision tree in my analysis. Let us say there are 10 minutes, spread evenly over the 960 minute period, during which I think of each of the 10 persons. Now the probability of receiving a call during any of those 10 minutes is 1/960. I further assume that I have a 2 line phone, which means I can receive two calls simultaneously, therefore, the probability of receiving a call during one of those 10 minutes is 1/960 + 1/960 = 2/960. Once I have received a call, within those 10 minutes, the probability that call being from one of those 10 persons of that day is 10/200 or 0.05. If the call is from one of those 10 people, then the probability that the call is from that very person whom I was thinking about earlier is 1/10 or 0.1, thus, the probability of receiving a call from the correct person is 2/960 x 10/200 x 1/10 or 0.00001. Since there are 10 such minutes during a day, the total probability per day is 0.0001. The probability of such an incident over a 10 year period is 0.0001 x 365 x 10 = 0.38 (my answer.)

I am not sure how the author got his answer, 0.52. Can you please check where I am going wrong?

Thanks,

MG.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know where the author's answer came from. I understand your process, and also find that the expected number of calls per 10 years is 0.38 based on those assumptions. (The probability of getting a call like that is somewhat lower, 31.7%, because some people will get several such calls.)

The assumptions that you think of your friends for only an instant (leading to 1/960) and with equal probability both make the probability lower than I would have expected. If you think of each of the 10 friends for 1 minute each, that doubles the expected number of such calls/decade to 0.76; if you have some 'better friends' about whom you think more frequently and who are more likely to call, the expected number also rises.
 
CRGreathouse,

Thanks a lot for that.

The probability of getting a call like that is somewhat lower, 31.7%, because some people will get several such calls.
I don't understand what you mean by this quote.
 
If you roll three (normal 6-sided) dice, the average number of 1s is 0.5. If 100 people roll three dice each, the average expected number of 1s for the whole group is 100 * 0.5 = 50.

But some people will get more than one of those 50, leaving more than half the people without any 1s.

In particular, (5/6)^3 * 100 ≈ 58 people, on average, won't get any 1s, while 3*(1/6)^2(5/6)*100 ≈ 7 people will get two 1s and 3*(1/6)*(5/6)^2*10 ≈ 35 people will get exactly one.
 
musicgold said:
Hi,

I have been reading the book "200% of Nothing" by A K Dewdney, which explains various math abuses experienced in the real life. One of the examples explains the math behind a so called telepathy incidence; a coincidence in which, one gets the phone call from the very person whom she was thinking about just a minute ago. I am not able to get the final answer provided by the author. Can you please check my approach to the problem?

The example goes something like this: Suppose, for example, that you know 200 people (family, friends and colleagues) well enough to find yourself thinking about each of them occasionally. Suppose that you think about 10 of those people per day and two of them call you each day on average. The calls could come at any time during those 16 waking hours. Now, when the phone rings, the probability of one of those 10 people, about whom you thought about during the day has called, is 10/200 or 0.05. Now, the probability that the call is from someone you thought of in the previous minute is 1/960 or 0.0001, where 960 is the number of minutes in 16 waking hours. Although the chances of having such a call on a particular day are very small, if we consider a period of 10 years, i.e. 3650 days, the probability over this period climbs to 0.52 (the final answer.)


I am not sure how the author got his answer, 0.52. Can you please check where I am going wrong?

Thanks,

MG.

The population is 200.
The persons thought of are 10 per day.
The calls are 2 per day.
When considering the thought of part, ask yourself, how many ways are there to form a unique set of 10 persons.
When considering the calls, ask yourself, how many ways are there to form a unique set of 2 persons.
Just figure the probability for a day, which will not change over
time. The answer is much smaller than that given.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K