Thread Closed

In QM: How to derive <x|f> from f_n(x)?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Oct13-08, 09:11 AM   #1
 

In QM: How to derive <x|f> from f_n(x)?


1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

If you have a function f_n(x), how do you get the equivalent representation <x|f>?


2. Relevant equations

I have a system with a given Hamiltonian (not in matrix-form), from which I derived the specter of energy eigenvalues E_n, and the corresponding energy eigenfunctions f_n(x). However, I am asked to derive the eigenstates in the form <x|f> also, how do I do that?


3. The attempt at a solution
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Galaxies fed by funnels of fuel
>> The better to see you with: Scientists build record-setting metamaterial flat lens
>> Google eyes emerging markets networks
Oct13-08, 09:50 AM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
f_n(x) is equivalent to [itex]\left< x | f_n \right>[/itex]
Oct13-08, 11:10 AM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
By the way, it is "spectrum", not "specter". Although, with Halloween coming, it may be appropriate!

As gabbagabbahey said, f_n(x) IS [itex]\left< x | f_n \right>[/itex] . <x, f> is the sum of [itex]\left< x | f_n \right>[/itex] over all n.
Oct13-08, 12:18 PM   #4
 

In QM: How to derive <x|f> from f_n(x)?


Thanks for the answers! So what is then meant by

“When you have found the spectrum of energy-eigenvalues, find the corresponding energy-eigenstates, both the abstract number basis and the concrete position-representation <x|f>.”?

Is “the abstract number basis” the same as f_n(x) (the one I have found)? And is “the concrete position representation <x|f>” then the sum of f_n(x) over all n?

And thanks for the correction of my misspelling, English is not my mother tounge…
Oct13-08, 12:30 PM   #5
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Suppose one of the energy eigenstates in some abstract basis was

[tex]|f_1 \rangle =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} |x \rangle -\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}} |y \rangle[/tex]

Then in the concrete basis it would be [itex]f_1(x)=\langle x|f_1 \rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[/itex]
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: In QM: How to derive <x|f> from f_n(x)?
Thread Forum Replies
Derive 6 Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
another derive Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Einstein did not derive E =mc2 first Special & General Relativity 38
Derive an Expression Introductory Physics Homework 1