## Show operator can be an eigenfunction of another operator given commutation relation

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Suppose that two operators P and Q satisfy the commutation relation: [P,Q]=P. Suppose that psi is an eigenfunction of the operator P with eigenvalue p. Show that Qpsi is also an eigenfunction of P, and find its eigenvalue.

2. Relevant equations

3. The attempt at a solution
First off, I know that if psi is an eigenfunction of P it means that P(psi)=p*psi. If Qpsi is also an eigenfunction of P it means that P(Qpsi)=q*Qpsi. p and q would be the eigenvalues. I also know that I have to use the commutation relation to manipulate these two equations. What I don't understand is how [P,Q] can equal Q. I thought [P,Q]=PQ-QP=0 if the two operators commute.

 PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com >> Hong Kong launches first electric taxis>> Morocco to harness the wind in energy hunt>> Galaxy's Ring of Fire

Blog Entries: 1
Recognitions:
Gold Member
Staff Emeritus
 Quote by lilsalsa74 I thought [P,Q]=PQ-QP=0 if the two operators commute.
The question doesn't say that P & Q commute does it?

 Correction: The two operators P and Q satisfy the commutation relation [P,Q]=Q. It doesn't say that they commute but that they satisy the relation. How else can they satisfy the relation if they don't commute?

Blog Entries: 1
Recognitions:
Gold Member
Staff Emeritus

## Show operator can be an eigenfunction of another operator given commutation relation

 Quote by lilsalsa74 Correction: The two operators P and Q satisfy the commutation relation [P,Q]=Q. It doesn't say that they commute but that they satisy the relation. How else can they satisfy the relation if they don't commute?
What condition must two operators satisfy to be said to commute?

(HINT: You said it yourself in your first post)

Edit: Perhaps I'm being a little too cryptic here. My point was merely that to commute P and Q must satisfy [P,Q] = 0, since they don't they do not commute. However, does because they do not commute doesn't mean they cannot satisfy a general commutation relation.

Does that make sense?

 So P and Q satisfy the given relation...this means that PQ-QP=Q? Is this the correct expression I should be using to evaluate the eigenvalues?

Recognitions: