Why is 3 mg Too Much for PCR Reaction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karthik3k
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of using an excessive amount of DNA template (3 mg) in a PCR reaction, specifically addressing the lack of product observed after running the gel. Participants explore potential reasons for this outcome, including the implications of template concentration on reaction efficiency and specificity.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports using 3 mg of DNA template instead of the recommended 10 ng, leading to no observable product on a gel.
  • Another participant questions whether the user meant 3 ng, suggesting that while 3 ng is on the low end, it should still yield results if the sample and controls were functioning properly.
  • A participant confirms the use of 3 micrograms, clarifying the amount used in the reaction.
  • It is proposed that excessive DNA template can inhibit PCR due to competition for primer annealing and depletion of dNTPs, potentially resulting in short fragments and increased nonspecific binding.
  • Concerns are raised about contaminants from the DNA isolation process being introduced by using a large volume of template, which could inhibit the enzyme's activity.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the normal range for DNA template should be between 10 ng and 500 ng, noting that less template can lead to fewer contaminants and a more efficient reaction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that using 3 mg of DNA template is excessive and likely contributes to the lack of PCR product, but there is no consensus on the specific mechanisms at play or the best practices for template concentration.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors that could influence PCR outcomes, such as the quality of the DNA isolation method and the presence of contaminants, but these aspects remain unresolved in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for researchers and practitioners involved in molecular biology, particularly those working with PCR techniques and troubleshooting reaction issues.

karthik3k
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
I used 3mg intsead of 10ng template for PCR reaction.

And i didnt find any product when i ran it on a gel.

Can anybody explain why this happens ?

Plz don't say its due to impurities...
Iam quiet sure abt the sample i used ...

THanx
 
Biology news on Phys.org
You mean 3 ng? You are on the low end, but it still should be enough. First questions: did the PCR work before, did the sample work before, did you include positive controls in the protocol?
 
Yes.
I used 3 micro gram
 
Too much DNA template is inhibitory due to competition for annealing of primers and dNTPs. So you end up with a lot of short fragment because dNTPs is depleted quickly. It should also be noted that the probability of nonspecific primer binding is increased due to change of the optimal quality to a suboptimal quality.

Also large volume of template migth carry "garbage" from the DNA isolation step, depending on the methode use and you. This "garbage" migth inhibit the enzyme.
 
karthik3k said:
I used 3 micro gram
Ah, you can tell from my asumption it must've been 3 ng.. that 3 mg really is way too much :smile: the normal range would be 10 ng - 500 ng, less is better since you get less contaminants and the reaction overall is more efficient.

Ian said it well, your primers are binding all over the genome since there is so much DNA to bind to, your dNTPs get depleted, and you are introducing contaminants by adding such a large volume (remember DNA binds proteins).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K