Could positrons be electrons from the future traveling back in time?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ensabah6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons Future Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the hypothesis that positrons could be electrons traveling back in time, referencing Feynman diagrams and concepts from quantum field theory. Participants examine the implications of time symmetry, particle-antiparticle interactions, and the nature of quantum fluctuations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that positrons might be interpreted as electrons from the future due to the mirror time symmetry suggested by Feynman diagrams.
  • Others argue that the interpretation involving classical propagators for particles and antiparticles aligns with the Feynman propagator, but emphasize the importance of maintaining causality.
  • A participant challenges the idea by stating that Feynman diagrams do not include a time variable, suggesting that nothing is actually going "backward in time."
  • Another viewpoint discusses quantum fluctuations where particles and antiparticles can emerge from the vacuum, questioning the necessity of a time travel interpretation and mentioning experimental observations.
  • Concerns are raised about whether all antiparticles would be expected to travel back in time if any do, and questions about the matter-antimatter asymmetry in the context of the Big Bang theory are introduced.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of the relationship between positrons and time travel, with no consensus reached on the validity of the time travel hypothesis or the implications of quantum fluctuations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on interpretations of Feynman diagrams, the assumptions regarding causality, and the unresolved nature of the questions surrounding matter-antimatter asymmetry.

ensabah6
Messages
691
Reaction score
0
Could positrons be electrons from the future traveling back in time? The Feynman diagrams suggest mirror time symmetry.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually I think that is one possible interpretation. The interpretation is supported by the fact, that if you add "classical propagators" for particles going forward in time (retarded Green's functions for positive frequency modes) and anti-particles going backward in time (advanced Green's functions for negative frequency modes) you recover precisely the Feynman propagator [IIRC].

This may sound weird, and one should convince oneself that no causality is violated (e.g. by creating a positron now, we cannot affect an electron in the past; or something like that).
 
FDs are 4D Fourier transforms of space and time, so there is no time variable in a FD.
Nothing is going "backward in time".
 
This may be too limited a perspective to really answer the question, but in quantum field theory a particle and it's antiparticle (electron and positron,say) can momentarily emerge from the vacuum as a quantum fluctuation; conversely if a pair aninihilate one another the resulting photon can subsequently give rise to another particle antiparticle pair...

These are observed experimentally, I think, so I don't see anything from this that is as mysterious as traveling back in time. Furthermore, these antiparticles can be sucked into a black hole (from just outside the event horizon) where upon the mass of the black hole theoretically decreases...Haven't read anything here either about time reversal.

Would ALL antiparticles be "expected" to travel back in time if any did?? Does big bang theory have any explanations about why matter predominated over anitmatter...I don't recall how much is theorized about that...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K