Clarifying Confusion: Understanding Einstein's Theory of Relativity

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Alkatran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Relativity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around clarifying concepts related to Einstein's theory of relativity, particularly special relativity (SR). Participants explore the implications of light speed constancy, time dilation, and length contraction, as well as the historical context of the theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the implications of light speed being constant for different observers and questions whether changes in speed and distance negate this difference.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the theory was originally a postulate rather than a conclusion drawn from experimental evidence, providing a historical context for the development of relativity.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between length contraction and time dilation, with a suggestion to view these effects as consequences of the constancy of the speed of light.
  • Participants debate the concept of approaching light speed, noting that while one can measure their speed relative to other objects, the speed of light remains constant and unattainable.
  • One participant highlights the complexity of measuring speeds in the context of relativity, pointing out that different reference frames can yield different observations of speed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and interpretation of relativity, with no clear consensus on the implications of light speed constancy and its effects on measurements of speed and time. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the challenges of reconciling classical mechanics with relativistic concepts, and there are indications of missing assumptions regarding the definitions of speed and reference frames in relativity.

Alkatran
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
959
Reaction score
0
I've just read part of Einstein's book on relativity (for a physics project in high school). I just need clarification on a few points:

The theory was figured out because it was found that light speed is the same relative to you, and your friend, and... (everything).
Things get shorter when they go faster, they move slower through time when they go faster, etc. Right?
Does the change in speed/distance cancel out the whole "light is different for me than it is for you" thing? (I don't think it does, I'm not sure if it should?)
It's impossible to reach lightspeed because the energy required goes up. (Lightspeed relative to what? I thought it was relative to you? How can you know if you're approching light speed if light is still going c faster than you??)

The general language in the book is "ALMOST" over my head. I think I'll need to read it twice..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you probably want to re-read the book. You'll understand more the second time around. It's hard to read science just once and take everything away from it.

Your questions are some of the most major effects of SR. They are doubtlessly explained in the book.

cookiemonster
 
Alkatran said:
The theory was figured out because it was found that light speed is the same relative to you, and your friend, and... (everything).
The theory arose based on a postulate, not because it was found that ... Later, the postulate would suffer various tests and always prove true, but originally, it was simply postulated. Note that there is a subtle distinction that should be addressed. Perhaps this (very basic version of the) history will help clarify:

- Issac Newton made a huge step to organize physical phenomena into a concise set of mathematical relations.
- Electromagnetism began to culminate in the late-mid 19th century with Maxwell's unification. The (classical) culmination basically concluded with Hertz demonstration of E&M waves at the end of the 19th century.
- Either Newton's mechanics or electromagnetism needed to be adjusted because they behaved fundamentally differently. There was a lot of work to force E&M to play nicely with Newton. Einstein was playing for the other team and officialized the modification of classical mechanics (i.e. Newton's laws) into what we now call special relativity.




Alkatran said:
Does the change in speed/distance cancel out the whole "light is different for me than it is for you" thing?
Sort of. But, I recommend to think of the length contraction and time dilation as a consequence of the constancy of c rather than what enables the constancy of c. This is, of course, a very difficult thing to do at first, after a life of having Euclid's postulates crammed down your throat in a misleading physical context (i.e. visual high school geometry).




Alkatran said:
Lightspeed relative to what? I thought it was relative to you? How can you know if you're approching light speed if light is still going c faster than you??
EXCELLENT! This is exactly what should have occurred to you. This is basically a major facet of the other postulate of special relativity that says the laws of physics do not depend on the relative velocity of the observer to any other observer, in so many words. Of course, there are several problems with the way I have just stated it, so make sure that, if you want to memorize it, you find a very rigorous source.
 
Alkatran said:
Lightspeed relative to what? I thought it was relative to you? How can you know if you're approching light speed if light is still going c faster than you??

OK, there is what turin said but also: yes, no matter how much you increase your speed, the beam of light in front of you will always race away at c, however relative to a non-light object, you can still say your approaching c. c is just a number. While that pesky beam of light is traveling at c, you can still measure yourself traveling at say 0.5c relative to your friend who's watching you pathetically try and catch it. As for light speed relative to what...it's the theory of relativity, pick something! If you're traveling at 0.99c relative to one object, it will take a tremendous amount of energy to increase your velocity relative to it. If someone is traveling with you at 0.98c, it will be comparatively easy for you to increase your velocity relative to THAT observer (remember in Einstein's Universe 1+1 no longer equals 2.) Approaching the speed of light doesn't mean catching up with a light beam, it just means getting closer to that all important 300,000 km/s relative to whatever reference point you pick. The light beam will still be traveling away from you at the same speed. Always remember, c is just number.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K