Elementary math that professors cant solve

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter killerinstinct
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elementary Professors
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding ways to represent the number 20 using only three 9's and elementary mathematical operations. Participants explore various mathematical expressions, including those involving different bases, factorials, and square roots, while debating the classification of these methods as "elementary math."

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose using the expression 9 + 9/9 = 20 in base 5.
  • Others suggest alternative expressions such as (9 + 9)/0.9 = 20 and 9 * 9 - 9 = 20 in various bases.
  • There is a contention regarding whether using bases constitutes elementary math, with some arguing it does not.
  • A participant mentions that the original problem implies the number 20 should be interpreted in base 10.
  • Several participants share their own solutions and variations, including factorials and square roots, to achieve the number 20.
  • Discussion includes a related theme of using four 4's to represent numbers, with participants sharing their findings and methods.
  • Some participants express confusion or curiosity about the mathematical validity of certain expressions and operations involving zero and exponents.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on what constitutes elementary math, particularly regarding the use of bases and factorials. Multiple competing views remain on the validity of various proposed solutions and interpretations of the original problem.

Contextual Notes

Some expressions rely on specific interpretations of mathematical operations and definitions, which may not be universally accepted. The discussion includes unresolved questions about the classification of certain mathematical concepts as elementary.

killerinstinct
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
Using only three 9's along with elementary math symbols like + or -, see if you can arrange them to represent the number 20. Remeber that 99/9=11.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[tex]9+\frac{9}{9}=20_{(base 5)}[/tex]
 
Why shouldn't professors solve what even I can solve? [tex]\frac{(9+9)}{.9}=20[/tex]
 
Last edited:
arildno said:
[tex]9+\frac{9}{9}=20_{(base 5)}[/tex]
lol

[tex]9*9 - 9 = 20_{(base 36)}[/tex]

[tex]9*9 + 9 = 20_{(base 45)}[/tex]

[tex]9*(9 + 9) = 20_{(base 81)}[/tex]

[tex]9! + 9 - 9 = 20_{(base 181440)}[/tex]

[tex]9! + 9 + 9 = 20_{(base 181449)}[/tex]

[tex]9^9 - 9 = 20_{(base 193710240)}[/tex]

[tex]9^9 + 9 = 20_{(base 193710249)}[/tex]

etc...
 
Bases are not ELEMENTARY MATH!
 
killerinstinct said:
Bases are not ELEMENTARY MATH!
I think they are elementary :biggrin:
 
Regardless of how "elementary" bases are, the original problem says "the number 20" (which one can reasonably argue to be stated in base 10), instead of "a number with the representation '20' in some base".
 
Okay then, I cheated, I'm terribly sorry.
 
killerinstinct said:
Bases are not ELEMENTARY MATH!

My textbook called Elementary # Theory has bases in it... :wink:
 
  • #10
( 9² * sqrt(9) ) - sqrt(9) = (81*3)-3 = 240. I choose to use the division symbol / to cross the 4 et voila. :devil:
 
  • #11
In any case, why did you say professor's can't solve this? How many professors did you try?
 
  • #12
I know that there are many complicated (...) solutions to this problem. Many involving bases, but the most simplest solution is given by Grizzlycomet (look above) using only elementary basic math. It is not a matter of "professor not solving the problem", its just a FUN question! Don't interpet me wrong.
 
  • #13
Do you know about the "four fours" variation of this theme?
 
  • #14
Explain questions? (using four 4s to equal something)?
 
  • #15
That's right; if I remember correctly, every number up to and including 12(?) can be written with 4 4's and standard math operations (no silly base shifts..)

I'm not absolutely sure about the last member of this set (i.e., 12), it's been a while since I saw it.

(Of course, lots of other numbers can be written using 4 fours too, but they are not consecutive..)
 
  • #16
1 4x4/(4x4)
2 4x4/(4+4)
3 (4+4+4)/4
4 4+(4-4)/4
5 4+(4/4)^4
6 4+(4+4)/4
7 4+4-(4/4)
8 4+4x4/4
9 4+4+4/4
10 (44-4)/4
11 (4!+4)/4+4
12 (4!)x4/(4+4)


I had to use one "44". Is there a way to get 10 without resorting to this?

Njorl
 
  • #17
arildno said:
Okay then, I cheated, I'm terribly sorry.

Very naughty. As punishmnt, you should be whipped with a bundle of rays.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Njorl said:
I had to use one "44". Is there a way to get 10 without resorting to this?
Njorl
How about [tex]4+4+\frac{4}{\sqrt{4}}[/tex]
 
  • #20
There's another fun variation on this theme where you line up all the numbers from one to nine in threes and are supposed to make them add up to six by adding only plus, minus, division, multiplication, root and power signs (whole powers and roots, no logs!). You can also use ( and ) (forgot what they're called).

Like this:
Code:
1   1   1 = 6
2   2   2 = 6
3   3   3 = 6
4   4   4 = 6
5   5   5 = 6
6   6   6 = 6
7   7   7 = 6
8   8   8 = 6
9   9   9 = 6

For example (I hope I'm not ruining anything for anyone here :wink:):
6 + 6 - 6 = 6

Have fun.
 
  • #21
Grizzlycomet said:
How about [tex]4+4+\frac{4}{\sqrt{4}}[/tex]

I think using a square root implicity requires a "2".
 
  • #22
professors can't solve this? wow.
 
  • #23
Grizzlycomet said:
How about [tex]4+4+\frac{4}{\sqrt{4}}[/tex]

that works for me
 
  • #24
How about this one?

[(9-sqrt(9))!]/[(sqrt(9)!)^2]

the square root and the square kind of mess it up, but it's still pretty damn sweet
 
  • #25
Sweet. Good work!
 
  • #26
StonedPanda said:
How about this one?

[(9-sqrt(9))!]/[(sqrt(9)!)^2]

the square root and the square kind of mess it up, but it's still pretty damn sweet

That equals 20.

sqrt(9)=3
9-sqrt(9)=6
6!=720

6^2=36

720/36=20

Njorl
 
  • #27
1 1 1 = 6...(1+1+1)!
2 2 2 = 6...2+2+2
3 3 3 = 6...3x3-3
4 4 4 = 6...(4!/4)x40
5 5 5 = 6...5+5/5
6 6 6 = 6...6+6-6
7 7 7 = 6...7-7/7
8 8 8 = 6...(8-81/3)x80
9 9 9 = 6...9-9/(91/2)

Njorl
 
  • #28
How come I never thought of those answers that Njorl did. Hmmm, something is wrong with my brain. lol!
 
  • #29
Njorl said:
1 1 1 = 6...(1+1+1)!
2 2 2 = 6...2+2+2
3 3 3 = 6...3x3-3
4 4 4 = 6...(4!/4)x40
5 5 5 = 6...5+5/5
6 6 6 = 6...6+6-6
7 7 7 = 6...7-7/7
8 8 8 = 6...(8-81/3)x80
9 9 9 = 6...9-9/(91/2)

Njorl

what does 8^0 mean?
what does is equal?

and where do you get 9-9/9^1/2
doesnt 9-9=0, then 0/9^1/2=0?
 
  • #30
x^0 is equal to 1 for all real (and complex) x.

9 - 9/9^(1/2) is interpreted as [tex]9 - \frac{9}{9^{1/2}}[/tex]. If he had meant [tex]\frac{9 - 9}{9^{1/2}}[/tex], he would have written (9 - 9)/9^(1/2). The parantheses are important :P
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K