Heuristic explanation of why quantum mechanics plus SR imply antiparticles

Click For Summary
Quantum mechanics combined with special relativity leads to the necessity of antiparticles through the modification of the Schrödinger equation and the development of the Klein-Gordon equation, which introduces negative-energy states that create instability. The modern approach involves quantizing a continuous field, resulting in a local theory without negative energy solutions, yet allowing for negative frequency solutions. When quantizing a real-valued field, no antiparticles emerge, while a complex-valued field yields both particle and antiparticle solutions. The discussion also touches on the implications of locality in quantum theories, particularly concerning entanglement and non-local correlations. Ultimately, the relationship between energy, momentum, and mass in special relativity suggests that the existence of antiparticles is a natural outcome of the underlying mathematics.
feynmann
Messages
156
Reaction score
1
heuristic explanation of why quantum field theory imply antiparticles

I'm looking for a heuristic explanation of why quantum mechanics plus special relativity requires antiparticles, Does anybody want to take a crack at it? Or am I asking for the impossible?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Quantum mechanics plus special relativity does not necessarily require antiparticles: although it naturally accommodates them.

----The straightforward generalization of quantum mechanics to include special relativity requires a modification of the Schrodinger equation. Modifying the Hamiltonian to reflect the energy-momentum relation, E=\sqrt{m^2c^4+p^2c^2}, for relativistic particles,

\hat{H}=\sqrt{-\hbar^2c^2\nabla^2+m^2c^4}\,,​

leads to a non-local theory due to the differential under the square-root.

----Modifying the entire time-dependent Schrodinger equation to reflect the squared energy-momentum relation E^2=m^2c^4+p^2c^2 gives

-\hbar^2\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}\psi(\mathbf{x},t)=-\hbar^2c^2\nabla^2+m^2c^4\psi(\mathbf{x},t)\,,​

the Klein-Gordon equation. While this gives a local theory, it contains negative-energy states in its spectrum. This is a problem since perturbations can cause transitions indefinitely into lower states (hence, this theory is unstable).

----The modern view is to abandon any attempt to directly modify the Schrodinger equation, and instead, to quantize a continuous field, \phi(\mathbf{x},t), using ordinary quantum mechanics. The fields that are quantized, however, have dispersion relations of the same form as the squared energy-momentum relation E^2=m^2c^4+p^2c^2, with the energy, E, identified as the frequency, \omega_p, of propagating plane waves. The resulting Schrodinger equation, has no negative energy solutions, and is local. There are, however, negative frequency solutions associated with the field's dispersion relations.

In the case that a real-valued field is quantized, negative and positive frequency solutions are identified, and there are no antiparticles. In the case that a complex-valued field is quantized, negative and positive frequency solutions are the particle and anti-particle solutions, respectively.
 
TriTertButoxy said:
The resulting Schrodinger equation, has no negative energy solutions, and is local. There are, however, negative frequency solutions associated with the field's dispersion relations.

"Local" in which sense? For example, no non-local communication, or even no non-local correlation in entanglement? (If I may ask at the risk of going off-topic).

My understanding from articles and discussions of about a year ago is that (at least most) local theories require hidden variables, and that a large class of hidden-variable theories has meanwhile been disproven, that entanglement correlations are considered to demonstrate non-local correlations, even though this question is still somewhat open. "Non-local correlations" means that the effects are symmetric from each particles point of view, and therefore not usable for communication, which would require an asymmetric effect.
 
I'm sorry about the confusion:
By local I meant microcausal. That is, the commutators of observables (built out of field operators) with a space-like separation vanish. This ensures that two measurements with a space-like separation do not interfere with each other (no information propagates faster than the speed of light). However, observables with space-like separations may still be correlated giving rise to entanglement.
 
I think it depends on what you mean by "heuristic" - if it means "I want to understand the theory without understanding the mathematics behind it", the answer is no. If you're willing to live with an idea that's not too wrong, it's because the relationship between energy, momentum and mass in SR is quadratic, and just as you get two solutions to the quadratic equation, you get two particles of identical mass.
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K