Heuristic explanation of why quantum mechanics plus SR imply antiparticles

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the heuristic explanation of why quantum mechanics combined with special relativity implies the existence of antiparticles. Participants explore theoretical implications, mathematical formulations, and conceptual clarifications related to quantum field theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a heuristic explanation for the necessity of antiparticles in the context of quantum mechanics and special relativity.
  • Another participant argues that while quantum mechanics plus special relativity does not necessarily require antiparticles, it accommodates them through modifications to the Schrödinger equation and the introduction of the Klein-Gordon equation.
  • The Klein-Gordon equation leads to negative-energy states, which pose stability issues, prompting a shift towards quantizing fields instead of modifying the Schrödinger equation directly.
  • Quantizing a complex-valued field results in distinguishing between particle and antiparticle solutions, while a real-valued field does not yield antiparticles.
  • A participant questions the meaning of "local" in the context of the theory, linking it to concepts of non-local communication and entanglement correlations.
  • Another participant clarifies that "local" refers to microcausality, ensuring that measurements with space-like separation do not interfere with each other, although correlations may still exist.
  • One participant suggests that a heuristic understanding may not be achievable without delving into the mathematics, but notes the quadratic relationship between energy, momentum, and mass in special relativity as a potential intuitive basis for the existence of two particle solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of antiparticles in quantum mechanics and special relativity, with some arguing for their accommodation rather than requirement. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the heuristic explanation sought by the initial participant.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of locality and the unresolved implications of negative-energy states in quantum field theory. The relationship between energy, momentum, and mass is noted as quadratic, but its implications for particle solutions remain under discussion.

feynmann
Messages
156
Reaction score
1
heuristic explanation of why quantum field theory imply antiparticles

I'm looking for a heuristic explanation of why quantum mechanics plus special relativity requires antiparticles, Does anybody want to take a crack at it? Or am I asking for the impossible?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Quantum mechanics plus special relativity does not necessarily require antiparticles: although it naturally accommodates them.

----The straightforward generalization of quantum mechanics to include special relativity requires a modification of the Schrödinger equation. Modifying the Hamiltonian to reflect the energy-momentum relation, E=\sqrt{m^2c^4+p^2c^2}, for relativistic particles,

\hat{H}=\sqrt{-\hbar^2c^2\nabla^2+m^2c^4}\,,​

leads to a non-local theory due to the differential under the square-root.

----Modifying the entire time-dependent Schrödinger equation to reflect the squared energy-momentum relation E^2=m^2c^4+p^2c^2 gives

-\hbar^2\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}\psi(\mathbf{x},t)=-\hbar^2c^2\nabla^2+m^2c^4\psi(\mathbf{x},t)\,,​

the Klein-Gordon equation. While this gives a local theory, it contains negative-energy states in its spectrum. This is a problem since perturbations can cause transitions indefinitely into lower states (hence, this theory is unstable).

----The modern view is to abandon any attempt to directly modify the Schrödinger equation, and instead, to quantize a continuous field, \phi(\mathbf{x},t), using ordinary quantum mechanics. The fields that are quantized, however, have dispersion relations of the same form as the squared energy-momentum relation E^2=m^2c^4+p^2c^2, with the energy, E, identified as the frequency, \omega_p, of propagating plane waves. The resulting Schrödinger equation, has no negative energy solutions, and is local. There are, however, negative frequency solutions associated with the field's dispersion relations.

In the case that a real-valued field is quantized, negative and positive frequency solutions are identified, and there are no antiparticles. In the case that a complex-valued field is quantized, negative and positive frequency solutions are the particle and anti-particle solutions, respectively.
 
TriTertButoxy said:
The resulting Schrödinger equation, has no negative energy solutions, and is local. There are, however, negative frequency solutions associated with the field's dispersion relations.

"Local" in which sense? For example, no non-local communication, or even no non-local correlation in entanglement? (If I may ask at the risk of going off-topic).

My understanding from articles and discussions of about a year ago is that (at least most) local theories require hidden variables, and that a large class of hidden-variable theories has meanwhile been disproven, that entanglement correlations are considered to demonstrate non-local correlations, even though this question is still somewhat open. "Non-local correlations" means that the effects are symmetric from each particles point of view, and therefore not usable for communication, which would require an asymmetric effect.
 
I'm sorry about the confusion:
By local I meant microcausal. That is, the commutators of observables (built out of field operators) with a space-like separation vanish. This ensures that two measurements with a space-like separation do not interfere with each other (no information propagates faster than the speed of light). However, observables with space-like separations may still be correlated giving rise to entanglement.
 
I think it depends on what you mean by "heuristic" - if it means "I want to understand the theory without understanding the mathematics behind it", the answer is no. If you're willing to live with an idea that's not too wrong, it's because the relationship between energy, momentum and mass in SR is quadratic, and just as you get two solutions to the quadratic equation, you get two particles of identical mass.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 182 ·
7
Replies
182
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
841
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
957
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K