Life will always find a way to survive

  • Thread starter Thread starter hemmul
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Life
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the resilience of nature, specifically how plants can grow in seemingly inhospitable environments, such as on a rooftop covered with a rubber-like material. Participants explore the mechanisms of plant survival, the potential for nitrogen acquisition, and the implications for terraforming other planets like Mars.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses astonishment at finding flowers and small bushes growing on a rooftop, questioning how they could survive without soil.
  • Another participant mentions a tree growing on a bridge in New York City as a similar example of nature's resilience.
  • It is noted that plants primarily obtain their mass from carbon dioxide, along with minerals and water.
  • Questions arise about how plants could acquire necessary nitrates from roofing materials, with one participant suggesting the possibility of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in certain plants.
  • Clarification is provided regarding nitrogen-fixing bacteria and their role in converting atmospheric nitrogen into usable forms for plants.
  • Speculation occurs about the feasibility of sending genetically modified plants to Mars to create a livable environment, with suggestions for modifications to enhance their survival in harsh conditions.
  • One participant outlines the complex requirements for terraforming Mars, including the need for an atmosphere, liquid water, and the introduction of various bacteria and plant life to establish a sustainable ecosystem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the mechanisms of plant survival and the feasibility of terraforming Mars. There is no consensus on the specifics of how plants could thrive in such environments or the practicality of the proposed terraforming methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of ecological processes and the challenges of establishing life on Mars, but specific timelines and methods remain speculative and unresolved.

hemmul
Hi!
I am not a biologist, and this is actually not a question... i post rather just to share my astonishment by the power of nature :surprise:
Today, we have decided to make a short business-trip on a roof of our 9-floor house, to plug in a new sattelite antenna. Everyone knows what does an average house-roof look like - some weird materials, which are assigned to resist water, sunshine, strong winds and so on... neither metallic surfaces are very rare. But nearly the whole area is covered by a thick enough layer of some rubber-like mess (i can't remember the proper word for this at the moment, but this stuff is being installed under high temperature conditions, and then freezes to the black ellastic layer of solid patch). Of course, this layer is rather old, and alternating sun-rain-wind-sun-day-night... have made their job and at some places the pieces of the surface were lifted up, leaving the space beteween the layer and the actual roof, somewhere the it broke down into nearly-rectangular and approximately-hexagonal cells, but the main thing that made me halt for a couple of minutes gazing like a snake on it - was a group of flowers, somewhere even small bushes, that were growing quitely in the most comfortable place on the roof. There was a small beautiful yellow flower, a high "tree" (50+ cm) but without flowers yet...
i wonder HOW? HOW did they do IT?
I bet no one planted them!
For me, the only way of their appearance seems to be a wind that brought and left the seeds on the roof, which were then hosted by... by completely artificial layer of black rubber mess! How did they survive?
I thought that in order to grow, a plant has to exchange some chemicals (or whatever) with the ground... but the only thing those flowers have - is sun for photosynthesis and water-bringing-rain...
incredible :rolleyes:
 
Biology news on Phys.org
There was a bridge in the New York City area that was famous for having a tree growing naturally on it.
 
Actually plants get most of their mass from the gas CO2, the rest it needs are some minerals/salts and water :)
 
They need nitrate. How could they get this from roofing material? What is rubber exactly? I thought it was just a hydrocarbon polymer.

What kind of flowers were they? Could they have been nodular plants with nitrogen-fixing bacteria in them?
 
loseyourname said:
They need nitrate. How could they get this from roofing material? What is rubber exactly? I thought it was just a hydrocarbon polymer.

What kind of flowers were they? Could they have been nodular plants with nitrogen-fixing bacteria in them?

well, Big English Vocabulary states that this material is "goudron; tar".

hmmm... eh... :rolleyes: erm... your second question knocked me out... what's a "nodular" plant?
you know, unfortunately i had not got my digital cam that moment, so i'll try do describe it in more detail:
the yellow flower was ~20 cm high, its head had diameter of ~ 2 cm, with nearly 5-7 petals. there was nothing weird in the centre - just single pestil. also no leaves were detected along it's 2-mm-diameter green leg...
the high plant was like this: a long (50 cm) semi-zigzag stick (d~5mm), with the trails of appearing burgeons, but with no leaves, no flowers etc.
+ one thing: these two are everywhere: in the gardens, in the fields in mountains nearby - they are the ones that are the most wide-spread here.
well, its not a best description, so in the evening i'll try to filter out the recent photos - maybe one of them has the plants i mean...
 
Yeah, tar is a hydrocarbon, so it couldn't have gotten the nitrogen from that. Nodular plant is probably an erroneous term. Look at the roots. Certain plants, legumes in particular, have nodes on their roots that are filled with nitrogen-fixing bacteria, which can convert atmospheric nitrogen into nitrate, which the plant can then use to build amino acids - hence why legumes (beans, peas, etc.) are so high in protein.
 
loseyourname said:
Yeah, tar is a hydrocarbon, so it couldn't have gotten the nitrogen from that. Nodular plant is probably an erroneous term. Look at the roots. Certain plants, legumes in particular, have nodes on their roots that are filled with nitrogen-fixing bacteria, which can convert atmospheric nitrogen into nitrate, which the plant can then use to build amino acids - hence why legumes (beans, peas, etc.) are so high in protein.

WOW! :rolleyes:
Very interesting!
Thanks a lot!

hmm, does that mean that it is really possible to send some of such plants on, say, Mars, and in a couple of decades we'll have another frendly planet? (let's forget for a moment that sunshine is weaker there)
 
Specially gene modified plants could be made to do it, I think. Modified beans with huge tough leaves (to intercept enough phtons and survive the cold and low pressure), could manufacture nitrates for other (perhaps underground) life. Of course the don't ruin Mars fanatics would object.
 
Making Mars into a livable planet would be way more complicated than that. First, you'd need an atmosphere and liquid water. I suppose melting the ice would be the first step. Then you'd need to make sure that heat could be trapped (to keep the water from refreezing), so you'd need to introduce a great deal of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. You'd probably need billions of tons (in terms of biomass) of obligate anaerobic bacteria that use inorganic molecules other than oxygen to accept electrons at the end of the electron transport chain to produce that carbon dioxide. You would also need denitrifying soil bacteria to release nitrogen into the atmosphere. Once you have these two gases, you can then worry about plant life.

First, though, you'd need fungi and lichens to break down the soil into a form usable by plant life. The lichens would begin to release oxygen into the atmosphere at this point, and you could introduce aerobic bacteria, in particular nitrogen-fixing bacteria. This should make the soil usable and you could then introduce plant life. Once you have plant life and aerobic bacteria, the atmosphere would eventually be suitable for animal life.

I would imagine this process would not be all that easy. Melting the ice caps and introducing bacteria to produce carbon dioxide and nitrogen would probably take about 50-100 years (I have no idea how long it takes for enough gas to accumulate to create a favorable climate). Primary succession (the breakdown of soil) would then take about 30 years or so - this is the length of time it usually takes after the retreat of a glacier and I'm assuming it would be the same on Mars. Then you could introduce the plant life, and presumably it would take at least another 50 years for enough oxygen to accumulate and make animal life possible (again, another unsubstantiated guess - I'm no expert on rates of gas release in either plants or bacteria).

Anyway, it would be a nice experiment. Couldn't hurt to have another planet. I wouldn't even colonize it. Just send enough plant and animal life there and let them evolve on their own until the planet has distinct working ecosystems. Should we ever manage to complete destroy this planet, we could then have another to turn to while we let the Earth recover.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
19K