| Thread Closed |
Proof of Heisenberg formula |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jan8-09, 04:00 PM | #1 |
|
|
Proof of Heisenberg formula
Can anyone prove, in layman terms (or as close an approximation to layman terms as is possible), why exactly ∆p ∆x ≥ h-bar /2 ?
Please explain every step in the deduction, and not just with formulae. I can't just take something for granted. Thanks in advance. |
| PhysOrg.com |
physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Promising doped zirconia >> New X-ray method shows how frog embryos could help thwart disease >> Bringing life into focus |
| Jan8-09, 04:36 PM | #2 |
|
|
how can one proove anything in layman terms? :P
You can find the derivation in almost any QM-text book. |
| Jan8-09, 04:38 PM | #3 |
|
|
As simple as possible terms, then. I'll ask if I don't understand something.
|
| Jan8-09, 04:50 PM | #4 |
|
|
Proof of Heisenberg formula
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle
you have it there, under "Derivations", can be found in almost any QM textbook |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Proof of Heisenberg formula
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Proof of the summation formula | Calculus | 1 | ||
| I this formula is true according to Heisenberg uncertainty principle | General Physics | 1 | ||
| Proof for distance formula | General Math | 5 | ||
| WANTED: Proof of formula! | General Physics | 5 | ||