Is Choosing a Random Seed Truly Random?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chen
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of randomness in choosing a random seed for generating random numbers, particularly in the context of using simple programs or devices like calculators to simulate randomness, such as flipping a coin. Participants explore the nature of randomness, the effectiveness of different methods, and the philosophical implications of using technology versus physical actions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants share personal anecdotes about using programs to generate random numbers instead of physically flipping a coin, suggesting a humorous take on laziness.
  • One participant questions whether a coin can ever land on its side, introducing a playful consideration of probability.
  • A participant cites a poem by Piet Hein, suggesting that the act of flipping a coin can clarify one's hopes or decisions, and questions if a random number generator can provide a similar effect.
  • There is a claim that writing a true random number generator is complex, and that simple methods on calculators do not produce true randomness.
  • Another participant argues that flipping a coin is truly random due to the influence of various uncontrollable physical factors, contrasting it with computer-generated numbers, which may lack true randomness.
  • One participant suggests that choosing a random seed could introduce an element of true randomness, depending on the unpredictability of the seed itself.
  • A humorous reference is made to a programming consultant's remark about the reliability of random number generators, highlighting the limitations of generating multiple random numbers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of randomness, particularly between physical actions like coin flipping and computer-generated randomness. There is no consensus on whether one method is superior to the other, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the true nature of randomness in these contexts.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the limitations of their methods and the inherent unpredictability in both physical and computational approaches to randomness. The discussion touches on the complexity of defining and achieving true randomness.

Chen
Messages
976
Reaction score
1
I needed to flip a coin today to decide on something, but I could only get to a coin if I got up from my chair. So eventually I just wrote a little program to echo a random number... not that it's complicated but I think fetching a coin would have been easier. :wink:
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
i have done the same on my Ti-83 plus, fun times fun times :biggrin:
 
That's me in a nutshell :biggrin:
 
Geeks All Over The World Unite
 
Chen said:
I needed to flip a coin today to decide on something, but I could only get to a coin if I got up from my chair. So eventually I just wrote a little program to echo a random number... not that it's complicated but I think fetching a coin would have been easier. :wink:
You see, it's just like I always thought; often it's more work to be lazy then not. Some people expend more energy trying to avoid work then it would take to just do it. :smile:
 
You're my hero
 
Chen said:
I needed to flip a coin today to decide on something, but I could only get to a coin if I got up from my chair. So eventually I just wrote a little program to echo a random number... not that it's complicated but I think fetching a coin would have been easier. :wink:

A program, eh? Now that would be a lot easier than predicting the outcome by approximating the flick of the thumb as a delta function and solving the equations of motion, taking the fluctuations of the local air pressure into account.

Thanks for the time-saving tip!
 
wow, that's just sad and the worst part is...I've done the same thing
 
Does it ever land on its side?
 
  • #10
jimmy p said:
Does it ever land on its side?

that'd be one tough probability algorithm...
 
  • #11
A PSYCHOLOGICAL TIP
Whenever you're called on to make up your mind,
and you're hampered by not having any,
the best way to solve the dilemma, you'll find,
is simply by spinning a penny.
No - not so that chance shall decide the affair
while you're passively standing there moping;
but the moment the penny is up in the air,
you suddenly know what you're hoping

Piet Hein

Do you get the same effect with your random number generator?

Also, you can visit http://www.random.org/flip.html and flip coins from across the world - but be wary of the Belgian Euro! http://www.guardian.co.uk/euro/story/0,11306,627496,00.html

Matt
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
Chen said:
I needed to flip a coin today to decide on something, but I could only get to a coin if I got up from my chair. So eventually I just wrote a little program to echo a random number... not that it's complicated but I think fetching a coin would have been easier. :wink:

[nerdom ]Actually, writing a REAL random number generator would be
incredibly difficult.
Doing:
Label A
Rand(1,2)
Pause
Goto A
on your TI83 is not actually random :o


[/ultimate nerdom!]
 
  • #13
phatmonky said:
[nerdom ]Actually, writing a REAL random number generator would be
incredibly difficult.
Doing:
Label A
Rand(1,2)
Pause
Goto A
on your TI83 is not actually random :o


[/ultimate nerdom!]
Flipping a coin is just as random, so it doesn't really matter, does it?
 
  • #14
Chen said:
Flipping a coin is just as random, so it doesn't really matter, does it?

No it is not.
Flipping a coin is truly random. Your hand, minute changes in the air, friction on the table, etc. all add to the randomness and none of those events will ever be perfectly replicated again.

A computer (I've read of some that are supposedly trying to actually generate real random numbers, but this isn't part of this conversation) does not actually generate a TRULY random number. It does not have the means to. I can explain more, but google will come up with a million links explaining why - but if you sit and think for a short moment, you will realize that there is no way for our conventional computers, and especially a TI-83, to truly generate a random number at this present time.

Here's a decent link quickly addressing the issue: http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~skiena/jaialai/excerpts/node7.html
 
  • #15
But you could argue that choosing the random seed is adding some element of true randomness into the problem (providing you don't know how the algorithm works so have no idea what seed will produce what result - maybe you should roll a dice? :rolleyes:). Of course, this only really holds if you only draw one random number so I guess "best of 3" is out of the question.

Hehe, this reminds me of something I read in Numerical Recipes:
One of us recalls producing a 'random' plot with only 11 planes [i.e. really bad], and being told by his computer center's programming consultant that he had misused the random number generator: "We guarantee that each number is random individually, but we don't guarantee that more than one of them is random." Figure that out.

:smile:

Matt
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K