Understanding Delta Arguments in Limits for Beginners

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dcl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding delta arguments in limits, specifically delta-N and delta-epsilon arguments. Participants explore how to apply these concepts to various limit problems, including proving limits and understanding the definitions involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about delta-N and delta-epsilon arguments and requests help with specific limit problems.
  • Another participant points out that the original limit proposed by the first poster is incorrect, stating that \(\lim_{n \to \infty} (n + 4)^2\) does not equal 0.
  • A participant explains the definition of limits and provides a method to show that \(\lim_{x \to 3} 5x = 15\) using delta-epsilon arguments.
  • There is a discussion about the limit \(\lim_{x \to 4} \frac{1}{1 + x^2}\), with participants attempting to derive the limit using delta-epsilon arguments and expressing the need to manipulate the expression to meet the epsilon condition.
  • A later post corrects a typo in the first limit problem, clarifying that it should have been \(\lim_{n \to \infty} (n + 4)^{-2} = 0\) and requests further assistance with this corrected problem.
  • Another participant outlines the steps needed to show that \(\lim_{n \to \infty} (n + 4)^{-2} = 0\), emphasizing the need to find an appropriate N for the epsilon condition.
  • One participant expresses surprise at the simplicity of the solution to the corrected limit problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for clarity in applying delta arguments, but there is disagreement regarding the initial limit proposed, as one participant asserts it is incorrect while another later corrects it. The discussion remains unresolved on the best approach to the limit problems presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the need for specific conditions and manipulations to satisfy the epsilon criteria, but the discussion does not resolve the complexities involved in the delta-epsilon proofs.

dcl
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
I'm really stuck when it comes to proving things with delta-N or delta-Epsilon arguments.

I think my biggest problem is that I don't really see how they work or 'how' they prove the 'limit' or what have you.

Would anyone be able to show me how to do some of the following questions and somewhat explain what is going on..

Use delta-N arguments to prove that:
[tex]\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } (n + 4)^2 =0[/tex]

Use delta-epsilon arguments to prove that as x -> 3
[tex]5x \to 15[/tex]

Guess the limit and Use delta-epsilon arguments to prove your guess correct.
[tex] \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 4} \frac{1}{{1 + x^2 }}[/tex]

Many thanks in advance. My notes don't make it clear how I'm supposed to do this :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, first of all, you can't prove that
[tex]\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } (n + 4)^2 =0[/tex]
because it is not true. It should be obvious that that sequence has no limit. (If you had "-2" as the exponent instead of 2, then it would go to 0.)

The definition of "limit of a function" is "Given ε> 0, there exist a δ>0 such that if |x- x0|< δ then |f(x)- L|< ε. The "standard" proof of limits that you see in books starts from |f(x)-L|< &epsilong; and works backwards, calculating δ to show that it exists.

To show that [itex]\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to 3 } 5x =15[/itex] we need to get to |5x-15|< ε. Of course, |5x-15|= 5|x-3| so |5x-15|< ε is the same as |x-3|< &epsilon/5. We can take δ= &epsilon;/5.

[tex]\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 4} \frac{1}{{1 + x^2 }}[/tex]
is considerably harder! First, because I know that [itex]\frac{1}{1+x^2}[/itex] is a continuous function, I would "guess" that the limit is [itex]\frac{1}{1+4^2}= \frac{1}{17}[/itex].
That means I want to arrive at [itex]|/frac{1}{1+x^2}-/frac{1}{17}|< \epsilon[/itex].

That is: [itex]|\frac{17- 1- x^2}{1+x^2}|= |\frac{x^2- 16}{1+x^2}|= |\frac{(x-4)(x+4)}{1+x^2}|= |x-4||\frac{x+4}{1+x^2}|< \epsilon[\itex].<br /> <br /> The "x-4" term is exactly what we want. We have [itex]|x-4|< \epsilon\frac{x+4}{1+x^2}[\/tex] is close to 4, what must [itex]\frac{x+4}{1+x^2}[/itex] be close to?[/itex][/itex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
[tex]\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 4} \frac{1}{{1 + x^2 }}[/tex]
is considerably harder! First, because I know that [itex]\frac{1}{1+x^2}[/itex] is a continuous function, I would "guess" that the limit is [itex]\frac{1}{1+4^2}= \frac{1}{17}[/itex].
That means I want to arrive at [itex]|\frac{1}{1+x^2}-\frac{1}{17}|< \epsilon[/itex].

That is: [itex]|\frac{17- 1- x^2}{1+x^2}|= |\frac{x^2- 16}{1+x^2}|= |\frac{(x-4)(x+4)}{1+x^2}|= |x-4||\frac{x+4}{1+x^2}|< \epsilon[/itex].

The "x-4" term is exactly what we want. We have [itex]|x-4|< \epsilon\frac{1+x^2}{x+4}[/itex]; x is close to 4, what must [itex]\frac{1+x^{2}}{x+4}[/itex] be close to?

Just removing a few beauty spots..
 
Last edited:
I've probably learned more math and physics from reading posts and working problems that people have difficulty with, than sitting passively in class for hours.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for that, think I'm getting the hang of it...
Yeh, the first limit problem was a typo, it was meant to be:
[tex]\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } (n + 4)^-2 =0[/tex]
I don't suppose you could show me that, I 'think' I may have done it but I REALLY can't be sure :(
 
You must show, for arbitrary [tex]\epsilon>0[/tex] that there exist an N so that for all n>N, [tex]\frac{1}{(n+4)^{2}}<\epsilon[/tex] :

1. [tex]\frac{1}{(n+4)^{2}}[/tex] is decreasing with n

This should be fairly easy to prove!
Hence, if you are able to find an N which satisfy [tex]\frac{1}{(N+4)^{2}}<\epsilon[/tex] (for a given [tex]\epsilon>0[/tex]), you have also shown it for n>N

2. We want to find N so that:
[tex]\frac{1}{(N+4)^{2}}<\epsilon[/tex]

This inequality is equivalent to:
[tex]\frac{1}{\epsilon}<(N+4)^{2}[/tex]

Hence, we find the requirement on N:
[tex]N>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\epsilon}}-4[/tex]
 
Nice. I'm suprised it turned out to be that simple...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K