Thread Closed

Abstract Algebra - showing commutativity and associativity

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Feb11-09, 12:22 PM   #1
 

Abstract Algebra - showing commutativity and associativity


1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

I need to determine if a*b=ab+1 is commutative and associative.
* is any arbitrary operation

2. Relevant equations



3. The attempt at a solution
a*b=ab+1 is commutative, but not associative.
I'm getting stuck in showing why.
b*a=ba+1
a*(b*c)=a(b+1)
?????
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Front-row seats to climate change
>> Attacking MRSA with metals from antibacterial clays
>> New formula invented for microscope viewing, substitutes for federally controlled drug
Feb11-09, 12:24 PM   #2
 
Mentor
What are you definitions of associativity and commutivity?
 
Feb11-09, 12:27 PM   #3
 
commutative is iff a*b=b*a for all a and b.
associative is iff (a*b)*c=a*(b*c)
 
Feb11-09, 12:32 PM   #4
 
Mentor

Abstract Algebra - showing commutativity and associativity


Quote by kathrynag View Post
commutative is iff a*b=b*a for all a and b.
associative is iff (a*b)*c=a*(b*c)
Ok, so have you tried to use your operation for * in these expressions? If so, what did you get?
 
Feb11-09, 12:40 PM   #5
 
Quote by cristo View Post
Ok, so have you tried to use your operation for * in these expressions? If so, what did you get?
That's where I get confused in using the operation.
a*b=ab+1
so, b*a=ba+1

a*b=ab+1
so (a*b)*c=a*(b*c)
ab+1*c=a*(bc+1)
(ab+1)c+1=a(bc+1)+1
abc+c+1=abc+a+1
So, not associative.

Is this the right idea?
 
Feb11-09, 01:28 PM   #6
 
Mentor
Quote by kathrynag View Post
That's where I get confused in using the operation.
a*b=ab+1
so, b*a=ba+1
Yes, but why? You should state "because multiplication of real numbers in commutative..."

a*b=ab+1
so (a*b)*c=a*(b*c)
ab+1*c=a*(bc+1)
(ab+1)c+1=a(bc+1)+1
abc+c+1=abc+a+1
So, not associative.
This is a very sloppy way of doing things, since the equals signs don't hold: i.e. the thing on the left is not equal to the thing on the right.

Better would be to set it up something like this:

* is associative if(f) (a*b)*c=a*(b*c). Then,

LHS: (a*b)*c=(ab+1)*c=(ab+1)c+1=abc+c+1 ..(#)
RHS: a*(b*c)=a*(bc+1)=a(bc+1)+1=abc+a+1 ..(§)

Since (#)[itex]\neq[/itex](§), then * is not associative.
 
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Abstract Algebra - showing commutativity and associativity
Thread Forum Replies
Does commutativity imply associativity? General Math 5
Abstract Algebra Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
Linear algebra and abstract algebra simultaneously? Academic Guidance 1
Abstract Algebra Linear & Abstract Algebra 1
How much commutativity in associativity :) Linear & Abstract Algebra 9