| Thread Closed |
Abstract Algebra - showing commutativity and associativity |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Feb11-09, 12:22 PM | #1 |
|
|
Abstract Algebra - showing commutativity and associativity
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
I need to determine if a*b=ab+1 is commutative and associative. * is any arbitrary operation 2. Relevant equations 3. The attempt at a solution a*b=ab+1 is commutative, but not associative. I'm getting stuck in showing why. b*a=ba+1 a*(b*c)=a(b+1) ????? |
| Feb11-09, 12:24 PM | #2 |
|
Mentor
|
What are you definitions of associativity and commutivity?
|
| Feb11-09, 12:27 PM | #3 |
|
|
commutative is iff a*b=b*a for all a and b.
associative is iff (a*b)*c=a*(b*c) |
| Feb11-09, 12:32 PM | #4 |
|
Mentor
|
Abstract Algebra - showing commutativity and associativity |
| Feb11-09, 12:40 PM | #5 |
|
|
a*b=ab+1 so, b*a=ba+1 a*b=ab+1 so (a*b)*c=a*(b*c) ab+1*c=a*(bc+1) (ab+1)c+1=a(bc+1)+1 abc+c+1=abc+a+1 So, not associative. Is this the right idea? |
| Feb11-09, 01:28 PM | #6 |
|
Mentor
|
Better would be to set it up something like this: * is associative if(f) (a*b)*c=a*(b*c). Then, LHS: (a*b)*c=(ab+1)*c=(ab+1)c+1=abc+c+1 ..(#) RHS: a*(b*c)=a*(bc+1)=a(bc+1)+1=abc+a+1 ..(§) Since (#)[itex]\neq[/itex](§), then * is not associative. |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Abstract Algebra - showing commutativity and associativity
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Does commutativity imply associativity? | General Math | 5 | ||
| Abstract Algebra | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 5 | ||
| Linear algebra and abstract algebra simultaneously? | Academic Guidance | 1 | ||
| Abstract Algebra | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 1 | ||
| How much commutativity in associativity :) | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 9 | ||