Ages of starts from CMD


by randa177
Tags: ages, starts
randa177
randa177 is offline
#1
Feb12-09, 09:38 AM
P: 91
why is getting the age from CMD more accurate than getting it from photometry?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
NASA's space station Robonaut finally getting legs
Free the seed: OSSI nurtures growing plants without patent barriers
Going nuts? Turkey looks to pistachios to heat new eco-city
randa177
randa177 is offline
#2
Feb12-09, 09:39 AM
P: 91
I mean ages of start clusters!
randa177
randa177 is offline
#3
Feb16-09, 10:03 AM
P: 91
Why no one answered my question? Does it make sense?
Why are we requiring color magnitude diagrams to get ages.. Why are they the best?

mgb_phys
mgb_phys is offline
#4
Feb16-09, 10:31 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 8,961

Ages of starts from CMD


CMD isn't a very common abbreviation, most people would say HR diagram.
Do you mean - how to get the age of stars from a color magnitude (ie Hertzsprung–Russell) diagram?
randa177
randa177 is offline
#5
Feb16-09, 10:41 AM
P: 91
Quote Quote by mgb_phys View Post
CMD isn't a very common abbreviation, most people would say HR diagram.
Do you mean - how to get the age of stars from a color magnitude (ie Hertzsprung–Russell) diagram?
Actually I am reading papers about large magelanic cloud, and it always mentions that getting the age using CMD (H-R diagram) is more accurate than using photometry. why CMDs give the only truly accurate ages for star clusters?
mgb_phys
mgb_phys is offline
#6
Feb16-09, 10:45 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 8,961
Not sure I understand the question. You use photometry to get the color index of the star. Then plotted on the HR diagram gives you the age (or at least the evolutionary state of the star) for an accurate age you would also need to know metalicity and mass.
randa177
randa177 is offline
#7
Feb16-09, 11:18 AM
P: 91
Quote Quote by mgb_phys View Post
Not sure I understand the question. You use photometry to get the color index of the star. Then plotted on the HR diagram gives you the age (or at least the evolutionary state of the star) for an accurate age you would also need to know metalicity and mass.
Yes, that's right, but that uses the photometry of each star in the cluster, not the color/magnitude of the whole cluster, because the magnitude and integrated colors for a cluster as a whole doesn't give very accurate information... Oh, wait I think i've just answered my original question!!! .... i got confused too now!
randa177
randa177 is offline
#8
Feb20-09, 09:59 AM
P: 91
Hi,
I just wanted to let you know that I was right about the reason CMD (HR diagram)give most accurate ages for stellar clusters.
But can anyone let me know HOW we get the ages from CMDs (H-R diagrams)?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Calculus for All Ages Calculus 48
Recomend a book on Ice Ages Earth 7
What Causes Ice Ages? Earth 27
Distribution Coefficient! Fun for all ages! Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 2
Ages? General Discussion 2