The Most Impactful Year in Physics: 1666 or 1905?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on comparing the contributions to physics made in the years 1666 and 1905, specifically evaluating the impact of Isaac Newton's work versus Albert Einstein's theories, particularly special relativity (SR). Participants explore the intellectual contexts and challenges faced by these figures in their respective eras.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that 1666 is more impactful due to Newton's foundational contributions and the challenging intellectual environment he faced.
  • Others suggest that Einstein's work in 1905, particularly with special relativity, is equally significant, though they acknowledge he had more support from contemporaries.
  • A participant questions the comparison by introducing another year, 1686, and its relevance to the discussion.
  • There is a suggestion that the year 1666 underpins much of today's theoretical physics, emphasizing Newton's role.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; multiple competing views remain regarding which year had a greater impact on the field of physics.

Contextual Notes

Participants express differing views on the intellectual climate and available mathematical tools in each era, which may influence their assessments of impact.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
Which year saw the greatest contribution to physics by any individual?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1666.
But GR is the greatest.
 
I'd have to go with 1666. Comparing the intellectual climate of both eras, Newton had a much tougher trail to blaze, due to his lack of fellow researchers, as well as the fact that he didn't even have the mathematical tools in place to formulate his theories. Not that einstein picked SR off the shelf or anything, but he did have a significant supporting cast.
 
Last edited:
But the question is about Newton or SR...
 
1686. vs 1915. ?

To throw in another question ^
 
Which of those years more underlies today's physics overall?
 
Theoretical physics really had it's roots with Newton, so i'd say 1666.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
14K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
10K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K