Solving a Rotational Motion Problem: Determining Angular Velocity & Speed

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a rotational motion problem involving a thin rod that falls while pivoting at one end. Participants are tasked with determining the angular velocity as a function of the angle with the tabletop and the speed of the rod's tip just before it strikes the table.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods to solve the problem, including using torque and moment of inertia, as well as the Lagrangian formalism. Some suggest using conservation of energy as a simpler approach. Questions arise regarding the assumptions made about initial kinetic energy and the interpretation of variables like R and l.

Discussion Status

Several participants have shared their approaches and findings, with some suggesting alternative methods. There is an ongoing exploration of the problem, with no explicit consensus reached on the best approach. Guidance has been offered regarding the use of conservation of energy, and some participants are checking their solutions against different methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem originates from a section prior to the introduction of rotational kinetic energy, which may influence the methods considered. There is also a discussion about the lack of specification regarding initial conditions, particularly concerning initial kinetic energy.

e(ho0n3
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I need to confirm my solution to this problem: A thin rod of length [itex]l[/itex] stands vertically on a table. The rod begins to fall, but its lower end does not slide. (a) Determine the angular velocity of the rod as a function of the angle [itex]\phi[/itex] it makes with the tabletop. (b) What is the speed of the tip of the rod just before it strikes the table.

For (a), I found the moment of inertia [itex]I[/itex] for the rod as well as the torque. Then, I equated the expression I found for the torque with [itex]\tau = I\alpha[/itex] and solved for [itex]\alpha[/itex]. Knowing [itex]\alpha[/itex], I then calculated the angular velocity [itex]\omega[/itex] from it with some calculus.

For (b), the answer would be
[tex]v = R\omega(0)[/tex]​
using the [itex]\omega[/itex] I found in (a).

I was going to do the problem by simplifying the rod using center of mass concepts, but it seems I can't do this with rotational motion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you use the Lagrangian formalism? I'll work through the problem using it and post what I get.

Huh. The Lagrangian formalism leads to a nonlinear diff. eq..

OK, I adjusted the formalism a little bit, and I got the general expression for part a to be of the form:

ω = (+/-)√{ A - B sinφ }.

Did you get something of this form for part a? I think you probably would using the technique you mentioned.

For part b, you should just be able to plug in φ = 0 (or π) as you have done. I'm assuming that, by [itex]R[/itex], you mean [itex]l[/itex].
 
Last edited:
conservation of energy

e(ho0n3 said:
For (a), I found the moment of inertia [itex]I[/itex] for the rod as well as the torque. Then, I equated the expression I found for the torque with [itex]\tau = I\alpha[/itex] and solved for [itex]\alpha[/itex]. Knowing [itex]\alpha[/itex], I then calculated the angular velocity [itex]\omega[/itex] from it with some calculus.
No need for calculus or advanced methods. For (a) use conservation of energy. The rod can be viewed as being in pure rotation, so its KE is just the rotational KE about the pivot point. This will give an answer for ω as a function of φ.

As you noted, for (b) just plug in φ = 0 to find ω. The speed of the tip is v = ωl.
 
Doc Al said:
No need for calculus or advanced methods. For (a) use conservation of energy. The rod can be viewed as being in pure rotation, so its KE is just the rotational KE about the pivot point. This will give an answer for ω as a function of φ.
This problem came from a section before rotational kinetic energy is introduced so... . Anyways, let me check my solution using this method.

Let [itex]m[/itex] be the mass of the rod. Using conservation of energy yields
[tex]mgl/2 = mgl\sin \phi /2 + I{\omega}^2/2[/tex]​
where [itex]I = ml^2/3[/itex]. Solving for [itex]\omega[/itex] gives
[tex]\omega = \sqrt{\frac{3g(1 - \sin \phi)}{l}}[/tex]​
Thank goodness for energy methods.

turin said:
I'm assuming that, by [itex]R[/itex], you mean [itex]l[/itex].
Right. My mistake.
 
e(ho0n3,
Yeah, that's how I did it. Sorry about my rambling. There is one subtle issue. If you tip the rod over, then you will probably give it some initial kinetic energy as well. The problem doesn't specify, so I would just assume a negligible initial kinetic energy.
 
turin said:
e(ho0n3,
Yeah, that's how I did it. Sorry about my rambling. There is one subtle issue. If you tip the rod over, then you will probably give it some initial kinetic energy as well. The problem doesn't specify, so I would just assume a negligible initial kinetic energy.
Right. It seemed funny to me that a rod would just decide to fall on its own, but for the purposes of this problem I guess I'll have to assume this.
 

Similar threads

Replies
67
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K