How Many Involutions Can Be Defined in the Set of Real Functions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on identifying the number of involutions within the set of real functions, specifically those defined as f: ℝ → ℝ where f = f⁻¹. Three primary forms of involutions are presented: f(x) = a - x, f(x) = a/x, and f(x) = 1/(x - a) + a. The conversation highlights that while the second and third forms are undefined at certain points, they can still be considered involutions under specific conditions, such as defining f(0) = 0 and f(a) = a. The inquiry extends to the exploration of continuous functions and their properties as involutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of involution functions in mathematics
  • Familiarity with real analysis concepts
  • Knowledge of continuous and discontinuous functions
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of involution functions in real analysis
  • Explore the implications of continuity on involution functions
  • Investigate the classification of functions based on their continuity and differentiability
  • Examine examples of non-continuous functions and their applications in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of functions and their classifications, particularly in the context of involutions.

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,
the following problem popped in a different thread but the original one went off-topic, and I thought this question deserved a thread itself:

Let's consider the entire set of the real functions f:\Re\rightarrow\Re
A function f, with the property f=f^{-1} is called involution.

How many involutions is it possible to find in the set of real functions?
I know the following three forms: are there more?

f(x)=a-x

f(x)=\frac{a}{x}

f(x) = \frac{1}{x-a}+a
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your second and third examples are undefined for x=0, x=a respectively, so they do not give involutions R->R.

Edit: If you define f(0)=0, f(a)=a respectively, this does give involutions, although discontinuous ones.

As another example, the non-continuous function that swaps the intervals [0,1] and [2,3] is an involution. You may want to consider only continuous, differentiable or analytic functions.
 
Last edited:
...you are actually right.
I'll try to state my problem in a better way:

Let's consider a subset of the real numbers A \subseteq \Re, and the family of continous functions f:A \rightarrow A

In this way, all the functions I listed should be involutions. The second and the third one are involutions by simply letting A = \Re - \{0\} and A = \Re - \{a\}

My question remains the same: what/how many are the involution which we can define?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K