Do M-Theory's 10^100 Universes Truly Exist?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Curious6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    M-theory Multiverse
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence and nature of the universes predicted by M-Theory, specifically the claim of approximately 10^100 or 10^500 different possible universes. Participants explore whether these universes are real entities or merely abstract mathematical constructs, and the implications of their stability as vacua.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that M-Theory predicts around 10^100 universes, while others claim it is actually 10^500, suggesting a discrepancy in understanding the theory.
  • There is a proposal that all these universes should exist as they are all stable vacua, but this is challenged by the notion that they may only be mathematically possible without physical existence.
  • One participant questions the location of these multiverses, suggesting they might exist in higher dimensions, and raises doubts about their reality based solely on their stability.
  • Another participant elaborates on the implications of every atom in our universe corresponding to multiple other universes, indicating a complex web of worldlines branching off from our reality.
  • Concerns are expressed regarding the feasibility of accommodating the vast number of configurations and solutions that arise from M-Theory, hinting at potential limitations in the theory's applicability.
  • A later reply introduces the idea of whether all possibilities could interfere with each other, suggesting a superposition of realities, but it remains unclear if this notion has been previously accepted or rejected.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the number of universes predicted by M-Theory or their ontological status, with multiple competing views remaining throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity and ambiguity surrounding the interpretations of M-Theory, including the definitions of stability and existence of vacua, as well as the implications of worldlines and configurations.

Curious6
Messages
183
Reaction score
0
As I understand it, M-Theory predicts about 10^100 different possible universes and one of the main aims right now is to figure out the mechanism which selects our Universe out of all these possibilities. Does this mean that the other 10^100 universes are equally real and truly exist out there or are they just abstract mathematical possibilities allowed by M-Theory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please could anybody try to answer this question!
 
it's 10^500- and yes they all should exist- they are all stable vacua-

___________________________

/:set\AI transmedia laboratories

http://setai-transmedia.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OK, thanks for the answer. Where would these multiverses be though? I once read an article they would be in the higher dimensions? Also, how is it possible to say that all these multiverses truly exist only because they are stable vacua, it could just turn out that they are mathematically possible but are not really there.
 
Curious6 said:
As I understand it, M-Theory predicts about 10^100 different possible universes and one of the main aims right now is to figure out the mechanism which selects our Universe out of all these possibilities. Does this mean that the other 10^100 universes are equally real and truly exist out there or are they just abstract mathematical possibilities allowed by M-Theory?

In the beginning there was stringtheory, as more Mathematicians looked into the theory, 5 versions appeared, with the pertaining question:Which one is correct?..sending crises waves rippling across all of the Theoretical Mathematical Oceans.

Then out of the distant horizon came a sail-boat with the letter 'M' daubed upon it's sail, a lone passenger at the helm was proclaiming that:There is really only One Theory, the previous Five were just certain values of a more fundamental theory, all the Theoreticians jumped aboard and thus M-Theory was born.

As the theoreticians asked intruging questions about the theory, they were answered with an ever increasing complex varying solutions, with every solution producing extensions to the original Theory, one such question was posed:Does M-Theory allow for a single or Multiple number of Universe's?

The answer was when the solution does not fit reality of observation for the present Universe, then it is solved by the creation of a Universe THAT does explain the solution.

So many Mathematicians started to branch out into abstract arena's, and consequently started to jump ship, but when they jumped ship, they were actually jumping out of one Universe and into another, the corresponding theoreticians could find extensions and soon it was realized that for every Mathematician that jumped aboard the original 'Flagship-M', they could find a corresponding Universe with its own Laws and Complex Maths.

The current status is comparable to :For every SINGLE atom that has ever existed in THIS universe, they are deemed to really complete Universe's according to M-Theory, and their worldlines can be traced out of our current Universe, which means for about every square centimetre of 3-D space in our Universe, there are an Infinity number of worldlines branching off to a subsequence number of other Universe's, each with a slight variation of the original Maths that sent them on their way?

Some think that there will eventually be so many extentions to M-Theory, with a vast number of solutions to the slightest deviation from one world-line-history to another, that the many configurations of all of Vacua at any instant, still could not accommodate the exponential number of solutions that are currently gaining momentum!

The gentle breeze which fetched the flagship 'M' is starting to gust and blow the ship onto the rocky shore's of a isolated island of Vacua despair, the question is who is going to jump ship?.. and who is going to cling on to the rigging and hope their calculations are sufficient to allow for a 're-normalization' and soft landing!
 
Before I make any comments to the previous reply, I would like to thank Olias as he's made the picture clearer for me and I seem to understand the concept a bit better now.

Olias said:
The current status is comparable to :For every SINGLE atom that has ever existed in THIS universe, they are deemed to really complete Universe's according to M-Theory, and their worldlines can be traced out of our current Universe, which means for about every square centimetre of 3-D space in our Universe, there are an Infinity number of worldlines branching off to a subsequence number of other Universe's, each with a slight variation of the original Maths that sent them on their way?

What do you exactly mean by worldlines and that every atom that exists in this universe is deemed to complete other universes? Does this imply that every atom in this universe is actually part of many other universes (i.e. every atom corresponds to an extremely large number of other universes)?

Olias said:
Some think that there will eventually be so many extentions to M-Theory, with a vast number of solutions to the slightest deviation from one world-line-history to another, that the many configurations of all of Vacua at any instant, still could not accommodate the exponential number of solutions that are currently gaining momentum!

I'm sorry, but with this I understand that it is actually not possible to accommodate all these different universes due to the very large number of possible different configurations.

Olias said:
The gentle breeze which fetched the flagship 'M' is starting to gust and blow the ship onto the rocky shore's of a isolated island of Vacua despair, the question is who is going to jump ship?.. and who is going to cling on to the rigging and hope their calculations are sufficient to allow for a 're-normalization' and soft landing!

Nice analogy! Are you trying to say that the mathematician who is going to 'cling on to the rigging and hope their calculations are sufficient to allow for a 're-normalization' and soft landing'' is the one who will finally show what M-Theory really is?
 
setAI said:
it's 10^500- and yes they all should exist- they are all stable vacua-

___________________________

/:set\AI transmedia laboratories

http://setai-transmedia.com
Could all of the possibilities be considered all at one and interfere with each other to form a type of "path" integral. Could reality be a superposition of all of these? Or has this already been suggested and rejected?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Interesting point made by Mike2, does anybody know the answer to this?
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Some questions about Coleman's Baby Universe model
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Undergrad Is M-theory (a) self-consistent (b) externally consistent?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Graduate Can Cosmic Inflation and String Theory change fundamental laws?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Graduate Different symmetries or no symmetries in string theory?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Undergrad Multiple (Non-Interacting) Universes?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Undergrad Three questions regarding QG theories
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
High School Balancing theories and empirical data, especially concerning string theory
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
9K
High School M theory, holography, many worlds -- What we do know?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
High School Do Fictional Worlds Exist in the Multiverse?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Graduate MOND Theory Primer: Stacy McGaugh's Research Program Explored
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K