Red Shift caused by space itself ?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nigel johnstone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Red shift Shift Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of redshift, proposing that it may not solely result from the recession of distant objects but rather from the structure of space itself. The idea suggests that light waves, or "emanations," interact with a complex structure of space that can distort their progress, leading to a redshift effect. This perspective challenges traditional interpretations of redshift and posits that space has a tangible structure capable of influencing light. The mention of Halton Arp indicates a reference to alternative theories regarding cosmic redshift.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of redshift and its implications in astrophysics
  • Familiarity with Einstein's theories, particularly the concept of spacetime
  • Knowledge of particle physics and the behavior of particles under stress
  • Awareness of alternative cosmological theories, such as those proposed by Halton Arp
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of redshift in cosmology and its measurement techniques
  • Explore Einstein's theories of relativity and the rubber sheet analogy
  • Investigate the structure of space and its potential effects on light propagation
  • Examine Halton Arp's theories and their critiques within the scientific community
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and anyone interested in alternative theories of cosmology and the nature of light and space.

nigel johnstone
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
"Red Shift" caused by space itself ??

Perhaps the distant objects are not receding at all.
If "space" is not empty, but rather is a complex structure,
probably containing energy which can be released (wouldn't
we just love to know how), then as light "waves" - I prefer
to call them emanations - proceed through vast tracts of
structured "empty" space, perhaps the light is "tugged" by
the structure. This tugging would affect the red end of the
spectrum more than the UV end... thus causing a red shift.
N'est-ce pas ?

This structure of "empty" space can be shown capable of
producing opposite particles under stress.
That is... apply force to the structure and out pop particles-
albeit ones which "cancel" each other out, it is true.

If space can be distorted (by massive objects) then it must have
some kind of structure.
If there was literally nothing there, it could not be "bent" (as
in Einstein's "rubber sheet" example of orbits.
N'est-ce pas ?

Ergo, light passes through a structure that could impede its progress
or distort its progress.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Let me get this right...

Are you saying that space is expanding and the objects arent actually tavelling away, or that space isn't expanding and it just affects light to make it appear as though space is expanding?! Because if its the first one, you shouldn't be on these forums! If it's the second one... very unlikely
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K