Galvanizing and cathodic protection

  • Thread starter Thread starter peachy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Protection
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the galvanizing process and its role in cathodic protection for metals, particularly in the context of engineering education. Participants explore different understandings of how galvanizing interacts with corrosion and whether electric current is necessary for effective cathodic protection.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that galvanizing involves dipping metals in zinc, which acts as an anode, providing cathodic protection even when the coating is damaged, due to zinc's higher electronegativity compared to steel.
  • Others argue that cathodic protection requires an electric current, suggesting that galvanizing only serves as a protective coating similar to paint, and that a DC power source is necessary for true cathodic protection.
  • A participant notes that cathodic protection can be achieved through either sacrificial anodes or impressed current, indicating that both perspectives may hold validity.
  • Another participant expresses a need for definitive evidence to support the claim that electric current is not required for cathodic protection through galvanizing.
  • Questions are raised about the effectiveness of conducting greases in enhancing cathodic protection and the limitations of bituminous coatings on buried piping.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; multiple competing views on the necessity of electric current for cathodic protection remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of definitive sources cited to clarify the role of electric current in galvanizing and cathodic protection, and the discussion reflects varying interpretations of educational material on the topic.

peachy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
okay, I'm having an argument at home, we're all 2nd year engineers and have different views on the galvanizing process.

the way i see it is metals are dipped in zinc (anode) and are connected to the metal (cathode). a reaction takes place which provides cathodic protection to the metal if the galvanized coating happens to become chipped or scratched because the zinc is more electronegative than the steel.

the other two got taught (or understand from the teaching) that cathodic protection only takes place with an electic current running through the metals. as far as they're concerned galvanizing only protects steel by covering it, much like painting, to cathodically protect it you need to have the metals connected to a dc power source

any clear opinions/knowledge?? i would appreciate some proof of either theory too if possible

thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's been I while since i took my corrosion course, but I think you can achieve CP either by using a sacrificial anode (like zinc) or by using an "impressed current" - so you're both right. When you use a sacrificial anode, you reduce the rate of dissolution of the protected metal by making it a cathode.

I'm sure there are useful resources on the web.
 
yeah, I've since come to that conclusion but nowhere on the internet specifies 100% that there is no need for electric current to provide the cathodic protection. i need some hardcore evidence to prove my point...
 
Any corrosion book should have that.

Read : http://www.erps.com.au/the_rust_reaction.html

Try googling "sacrificial anode"...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do you think conducting or contact grease like the kind for wire to spark plug connections would work on the cathodic protection? Is there another type of grease or product that would not wash or melt away?
 
hongkongphooey said:
Do you think conducting or contact grease like the kind for wire to spark plug connections would work on the cathodic protection? Is there another type of grease or product that would not wash or melt away?

Buried piping is often coated with bitumus to prevent galvonic contact with soil. It is not extremely effective. Cathodic protection is still needed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K