The First Step Towards Colonizing Mars (or the Moon)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Whitestar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mars Moon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and design considerations for creating rotating habitats on Mars or the Moon to simulate gravity for potential colonization. Participants explore various aspects of artificial gravity, its effects on human physiology, and the engineering challenges involved in such habitats.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that rotating habitats could prevent bone mass loss and simulate gravity, suggesting a rotation speed to achieve approximately 62% of Earth's gravity.
  • Others question the effectiveness of simulated environments in alleviating motion sickness and express concerns about the costs of such habitats.
  • There are differing opinions on the required rotation speed, with some arguing that it would need to reach full 1g to be effective, while others suggest a combination of lateral and vertical accelerations.
  • One participant mentions the potential for taller growth in a low gravity environment, while another raises concerns about the long-term health effects of living in higher gravity conditions.
  • Technical discussions include the vector sum of gravitational forces and the implications of spinning habitats, with some participants calculating the net acceleration based on different scenarios.
  • There are considerations about the orientation of the spin and its effects on the occupants, with some suggesting that spinning horizontally could lead to varying gravitational experiences for individuals inside the habitat.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the design and implications of rotating habitats, with no clear consensus on the optimal approach or the effects of artificial gravity. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the technical details and physiological impacts.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the effects of artificial gravity on human health, the feasibility of engineering such habitats, and the mathematical calculations involved in determining the net gravitational forces experienced by occupants.

Whitestar
Messages
90
Reaction score
4
If we decide to one day collonize Mars or the Moon, I think it is absolutely essential to build habitats or domes that rotate. That way, people inside these dwellings won't be floating about. But most important of all, they also won't be losing any bone mass either, especially if they exercise daily. The gravity of Mars is only 38 percent of Earth's. All enigneers have to do is spin the domes to the point where it will be at about 62 percent gravity, thereby equaling that of Earth's. In addition, I think its vital to also install a series of cameras at the center of the dome where the gravity is zero. That way, if people suffer from motion sickness, all they have to do is close their window, activate a vid screen that will simulate any environment of their choosing such as a beach environment, accompanied with some sound effects of seagulls, and cranking up the a/c for some nice breezes.


Thoughts anyone?


Whitestar
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lol nice windows yah got there ;) but does that really cure motion sickness?

i don't know personally i think it would cost far too much, whereas you could just build a space colony or sommit
 
Seems Logical

Seems logical, but I would like to grow up in a low g environment because I would be taller.
 
Actually, I think it would have to spin up to a full g. The lateral acceleration of a spinning habitat would not be added to the vertical gravitation of the planet.
 
LURCH said:
Actually, I think it would have to spin up to a full g. The lateral acceleration of a spinning habitat would not be added to the vertical gravitation of the planet.

I think you would need a sum of the squares. Spinning in the plane of the surface of the planet to make .92 g outward, combined with .38 g downward would yield 1 g. The architecture would be bizarre. Each floor would be a truncated cone.

Njorl
 
LURCH said:
Actually, I think it would have to spin up to a full g. The lateral acceleration of a spinning habitat would not be added to the vertical gravitation of the planet.


If the dome were spinning to full g, would the gravity then be equal that of Earth's?


Whitestar
 
according to what theyre saying it sounds like it would be a bit more than Earth's,

if they do do this, i could see the future soldiers haveing there own colony with higher g forces just to improove strength - is that logical?
 
Njorl, you are absolutely right. The floor would have to be slanted in such a way is to be perpendicular to the sum of the two forces, and the rotation would only have to generate whatever Monte force is not being supplied by the ground.

Tsunami Joe, although living in higher G. forces sounds like it would be a way of developing greater physical strength, I have read that in reality it would lead to flat feet, prostate trouble, a host of kidney and intestinal complications, circulatory problems, and many other long-term effects that would not be beneficial to a soldier. Perhaps each trooper could spend a certain portion of his day (or maybe the entire day) in a high G. environment at the "lowest" level, which would be the level for this to the outside of the wheel. But at Taps, they would all climb "upstairs", to sleeping quarters closer to the center of the wheel, where gravity is 1 G or less. I'm not sure if this woodwork, but it would mean that the body is not subjected to the extra G. forces 24 hours a day.
 
LURCH said:
Actually, I think it would have to spin up to a full g. The lateral acceleration of a spinning habitat would not be added to the vertical gravitation of the planet.


If the dome were spinning to full g, would the gravity then be equal that of Earth's?


Whitestar
 
  • #10
I don't know how you want the dome spun. If it were spun around a vertical axis to produce an acceleration of g at its outer edge than that acceleration would be horizontal, away from the axis. You would still have the gravity of Mars or the Moon, acting down. Your net acceleration would be the vector sum of these. Say the downward acceleration was .25g, then the net acceleration would be 1.030776g slanted 14o down from horizontal. (by trig).
 
  • #11
selfAdjoint said:
I don't know how you want the dome spun. If it were spun around a vertical axis to produce an acceleration of g at its outer edge than that acceleration would be horizontal, away from the axis. You would still have the gravity of Mars or the Moon, acting down. Your net acceleration would be the vector sum of these. Say the downward acceleration was .25g, then the net acceleration would be 1.030776g slanted 14o down from horizontal. (by trig).


1) If that is the case, what is the total percentage of artificial gravity?


2) What if you spin the dome horizontally? What would happen then?


Whitestar
 
  • #12
according to what I am perceiving, if you want to change the gravity that goes to keep you down, it would have to be horizantaly.

but I am no physics genious so this is just perceiving
 
  • #13
Well if you had a drum rotating horizontally, obviouly half the time the people inside would be upside down. If you spun it for a constant g then the people on the top of the cycle would experience .75g (using my example of .25g for the planet) while on the bottom of the cycle they would experience 1.25g. Since the drum would have to spin pretty fast these variations would continually succeed each other at a fast pace. I would think that would make them pretty woozy. Might make a nice park ride though.
 
  • #14
lol they already gots stuff like that...not a g i don't think, maybe mroe though because the six flags place susposedly has a multi G ride or sommit

but as a semi side comment, what does the big thing that has a bunch of circles and they all rotate around you and your strapped into one of them and it spins also? astronauts train in em i think, just what does it do?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
23K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K