Is the Sun More Spherical or Oval? Investigating the Shape of Our Closest Star

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter brum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spherical Sun The sun
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Sun is not oval-shaped but is classified as an oblate spheroid, which means it is roughly spherical but slightly flattened at the poles due to its rotation. This shape does not influence the elliptical orbits of the planets, which are determined by gravitational forces as described by Newton's universal law of gravitation. The term "ellipse" refers specifically to a two-dimensional curve, while three-dimensional bodies like the Sun are accurately described as oblate or prolate spheroids. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for grasping the dynamics of celestial mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic celestial mechanics
  • Familiarity with Newton's universal law of gravitation
  • Knowledge of geometric terms: oblate spheroid and prolate spheroid
  • Basic concepts of orbital dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of oblate and prolate spheroids in astrophysics
  • Learn about Newton's universal law of gravitation and its applications
  • Explore the dynamics of planetary orbits and conic sections
  • Investigate the effects of a star's shape on its gravitational influence
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in understanding the shape and dynamics of celestial bodies.

brum
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
is the Sun a sphere (like the Earth) or is it more oval-shaped and elliptical?

because, since the Earth is (nearly) spherical, the moon has a (nearly) circular motion.


BUT, many (if not all) of the planets in the solar system have ELLIPTICAL orbits. This leads me to believe that the Sun is NOT SPHERICAL (!) but instead more shaped like an ELLIPSE.

(I always thought of the sun as pretty much spherical).

Is this correct?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You seem to be confusing two different shapes. Planetary orbits are in general elliptical, some more than others. The planets themselves, as well as the sun, are roughly spherical, somewhat flattened at the poles because of rotation.
 
The Sun is an oblate spheroid. Its shape is caused by its rotation, as mathman explained.

The word 'ellipse' describes a precise curve in two dimensions. It is not correct to say that a three-dimensional body is elliptical. The words for "stretched" spheres are "oblate spheroid" and "prolate spheroid," referring to spheres squashed at the poles or around the equator, respectively.

The movement of the planets and the shape of the central mass are not related. The shape of the Sun is unrelated to the shapes of the orbits of the planets. The shapes of the orbits of the planets are unrelated to the shape of the Sun.

When you're far away from a mass, the mass acts gravitationally as if it were concentrated in a point. As far as the planets are concerned (since they're far away from the Sun), the Sun is just a point mass. As far as the Moon is concerned, the Earth is just a point mass. The planets follow elliptical orbits, but it has nothing to do with the shape of the body they're orbiting.

You can solve Newton's universal law of gravitation (F = G (m1 m2) / r2) to discover that bodies orbit in curves described by conic sections (circles, ellipses, parabolae, and hyperbolae) with the center of mass of the system at one focus.

- Warren
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by chroot
The word 'ellipse' describes a precise curve in two dimensions. It is not correct to say that a three-dimensional body is elliptical. The words for "stretched" spheres are "oblate spheroid" and "prolate spheroid," referring to spheres squashed at the poles or around the equator, respectively.
- Warren

Yeah I realized that (about an ellipse is only 2D) but I didn't know the name for its 3D counterpart, so I just used the word ellipse for simplicity and to avoid confusion. THanks
 
Not to be a smarty-britches or anything of the sort, but if the Sun were to be stretched top from bottom (would this be prolate?) into a comically obscene cylinder shape, would this cause any orbits to change or would it still act as the point of mass described above.

Thank you, E6S.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K