Is there any point on setting an incline on a treadmill?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tyro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Incline Point
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of setting an incline on a treadmill and whether it impacts the work done by a runner. Participants explore the physical implications of incline running versus level running, considering physiological, psychological, and mechanical factors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that running on an incline may not require more work against gravity since the runner's overall elevation does not change, questioning if the perceived difficulty is psychological or physiological.
  • Others propose that running uphill allows for greater force output due to the engagement of body weight, which may not be as effectively utilized on a flat surface.
  • One participant argues that work is done on the treadmill as the runner's feet push down, equating it to walking up a stationary hill, though they express uncertainty about their understanding.
  • Several participants highlight that energy expenditure is not fully transmitted to the environment, noting that additional work is required to lift the body against gravity when on an incline.
  • It is mentioned that while the treadmill moves the runner back down, the work done in lifting the body upward is not regained, similar to the effort exerted when walking up stairs.
  • A later reply emphasizes that standing still on an inclined treadmill would result in rolling off, indicating that more work is necessary to counteract gravity's pull.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the relationship between incline and work done, with no consensus reached on whether the incline significantly alters the work required or if the differences are primarily psychological or physiological.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the efficiency of muscle work and the mechanics of energy expenditure are not fully explored, leaving room for further discussion on these aspects.

Tyro
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Since the runner's level does not actually change, they are not doing any work against gravity. Their total output wattage -- if it can be measured -- should be the same regardless of inclination.

Yet, running on an inclined treadmill seems more difficult. Is the difference purely in the runner's head, physiological (muscles work less efficiently at that configuration) or am I missing a physical reason why the runner actually does more work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm going to make a guess

based on common sense. That people can put out more work when they're walking uphill therefore the treadmill can be set to a higher force level. When they're on a level platform they have to use their arms to limit their motion, on the "hill" they have their body weight too.
 
I believe that the trick here is that you're doing work on the treadmill since your feet are pushing down on it, they're moving along, and work is a force through a distance

Or maybe you could look at it like it's the same as walking up a stationary hill, relatively

Maybe I don't know what I'm talking about, though
 
I see several factors at work here.

First, the work our bodies do is not entirely transmitted to the outside environment. Energy is expended doing work on our bodies in order to generate a force! For example, pushing on a wall is a lot harder than leaning against it.

Secondly, our bodies are not stationary as we walk on a treadmill; at the very least, we are moving one leg forward at all times. If we're on an incline, then we have to do (more) work against gravity to move our leg up the incline.

Also, I imagine our bodies are optimized for travel over level surfaces, so we probably waste extra energy when walking an incline.
 
If the treadmill is on a tilt, then every time you take a step forward, you lift your body upward and so do more work than if it were level. Of course, you don't go upward because the treadmill then moves you back downward but you don't "regain" the work you have done. If you walk up a flight of stairs and then take an elevator back down, you have still done the work of walking up stairs!
 
Originally posted by HallsofIvy
If the treadmill is on a tilt, then every time you take a step forward, you lift your body upward and so do more work than if it were level. Of course, you don't go upward because the treadmill then moves you back downward but you don't "regain" the work you have done. If you walk up a flight of stairs and then take an elevator back down, you have still done the work of walking up stairs!

This is exactly correct. Consider the fact that if you stand still on a horizontal treadmill, you will remain stationary. Do the same on an inclined treadmill, and you will roll off the back end. Extra work is required from you to counteract the effect of gravity trying to move you downward and, therefore, rearward. The steeper the incline, the more rapidly an inactive person would roll off, therefore the more work must be done to counteract this effect.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
16K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
780
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K