Is the Missing Antimatter of the Universe Just a Matter of Labeling?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Marts Liena
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antimatter Nature
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the hypothesis that the missing antimatter in the universe may not be absent but rather a result of mislabeling baryonic particles. Specifically, the proposal suggests that down quarks in protons and neutrons can be re-labeled as antidown quarks without altering their physical properties. This re-labeling leads to a theoretical framework where all positive nuclear particles are considered matter and all negative ones as antimatter, potentially resulting in a universe composed of 50% matter and 50% antimatter. This interpretation challenges existing notions of baryonic asymmetry and CP violation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quark composition in protons and neutrons
  • Familiarity with CP violation in particle physics
  • Knowledge of baryonic asymmetry concepts
  • Basic principles of antimatter and matter interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of quark re-labeling on particle physics
  • Explore the concept of baryonic asymmetry in greater detail
  • Investigate the role of CP violation in current physics theories
  • Learn about the properties and interactions of leptons in relation to antimatter
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in particle physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental nature of matter and antimatter, particularly those exploring the implications of CP violation and baryonic asymmetry.

Marts Liena
A colleague has posted an essay on antimatter at www.rfprobes.com.au/gimliphysics/symm.htm[/URL] . It is suggested that the missing antimatter of the universe is not missing at all. In other words there is no baryonic asymmetry and CP violation has been misinterpreted. I think the ideas are intesting if not radicle.

What do forum members think about this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Antimatter

How has CP violation been misinterpreted?

- Michelle (inertia)
 
very interesting,

The proposal is that the down quarks in protons and neutrons are re-labeled to antidown. In this way no physical properties of protons or neutrons are changed. In this scheme a down quark now has a charge of +1/3 while an antidown quark carries a charge of -1/3. Thus a proton will now be composed of two up quarks and an antidown quark and a neutron of two antidown quarks and an up quark. Nothing has changed but a name. The change is, however, very significant and is possible to make only because there is no absolute frame of reference for fundamental matter.

The outcome of re-labeling down quarks to antidown quarks is that all positive nuclear particles are now matter and all negative nuclear particles are antimatter. By extending this to include leptons it is now possible to have a universe that is 50% matter and 50% antimatter, ie. 50% positive and 50% negative. It means we humans also are 50/50 matter and antimatter. We do not annihilate because our like matter and antimatter particles are not available to do so. That is we do not have the required antiup quarks, down quarks and positrons to create an annihilation scenario.

Could this explain spontanious combustion in humans hehehe, there antiquark flipped out man.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K