Potential of an infinite line of charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the electric potential at a distance from an infinitely long straight wire with a uniform line charge. The problem involves understanding the implications of boundary conditions on potential and the relationship between electric field and potential in electrostatics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the formula for point charge potential and its limitations for continuous charge distributions. There are attempts to set up integrals for calculating potential and concerns about divergence when integrating over infinite limits. Questions arise regarding the necessity of calculating the electric field first and the implications of boundary conditions on potential.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various methods to approach the problem, including the use of Gauss' law and Poisson's equation. Some express uncertainty about the appropriateness of certain methods based on their current coursework. There is a recognition of the need to clarify assumptions regarding potential at infinity.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints related to the level of mathematical methods expected in the class, with some participants indicating that certain approaches may be beyond their current curriculum. The original poster questions the assumption that potential is zero at infinity, which is a critical aspect of the problem.

th5418
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find a potential a distance r from an infinitely long straight wire that carries a uniform line charge [tex]\lambda[/tex]. Compute the gradient of your potential and check that it yields the correct field.

Homework Equations


[tex]V=[/tex][tex]\frac{KQ}{R}[/tex]
[tex]\oint E \bullet dS=\frac{Q}{episolon}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried doing it the V=kq/r way, but then I realized it doesn't work, since for that it assumes that potential is zero infinitely far away. But it isn't. The problem doesn't want me to find the e-field first, which would be a lot easier, any tips?

Do i need to go to the most basic definition of potential?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
V=kq/r gives the potential of a point charge.

For a continuous linear charge distribution,

[tex]V(\textbf{r})=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int \frac{\lambda(\textbf{r}')dl'}{|\textbf{r}-\textbf{r}'|}[/tex]
 
Hm, yeah I got that.
This is what I have right now.

[tex]V=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_o}\int\frac{\lambda dx}{\sqrt{r^{2}+x^{2}}}[/tex]

But the integral blows up when I integrate from negative to positive infinity.
 
th5418 said:
But the integral blows up when I integrate from negative to positive infinity.

Yes, I suppose it does.

So, you can either compute the field first using Gauss' law and then find the potential using

[tex]V(\textbf{r})=-\int_{\mathcal{O}}^{\textbf{r}}\textbf{E}\cdot d\textbf{l}[/tex]

Or, if you aren't allowed to do that, use separation of variables to solve Laplace's equation in cylindrical coordinates.
 
I can do that? Please advise on that second part.

This is using [tex]\nabla^{2} V = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_o}[/tex]??
 
th5418 said:
I can do that? Please advise on that second part.

This is using [tex]\nabla^{2} V = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_o}[/tex]??

Yes (sorry , I meant Poisson's equation, not Laplace's), based on symmetry, what variables would you expect [itex]V[/itex] to depend on? The distance from the axis? The axial coordinate? The azimuthal coordinate? You can use that to express [itex]\nabla^2V[/itex] in terms of ordinary derivatives, giving you a second order ODE to solve.
 
That's out of the league of the class. I could do it though...

I know the potential field is suppose to be...

[tex]V = -\frac{\sigma}{2\pi \epsilon_o} ln(r)[/tex]

Is there any other way to solve this? I've exhausted all possibilities.

QUESTION:
For the
[tex]V=\frac{kq}{r}[/tex]
does that assume that potential is 0 [tex]\infty[/tex] far away?
 
Last edited:
th5418 said:
That's out of the league of the class. I could do it though...

I know the potential field is suppose to be...

[tex]V = \frac{\sigma}{2\pi \epsilon_o} ln(r)[/tex]

Is there any other way to solve this? I've exhausted all possibilities.

If you haven't been taught this method yet, then I would guess you are expected to first calculate the electric field and then integrate...the question doesn't explicitly tell you not to do that does it?

QUESTION:
For the
[tex]V=\frac{kq}{r}[/tex]
does that assume that potential is 0 [tex]\infty[/tex] far away?

Yes,

[tex]V(\textbf{r})=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int \frac{\lambda(\textbf{r}')dl'}{|\textbf{r}-\textbf{r}'|}[/tex]

is a solution (in integral form) of Poisson's equation, subject to the boundary condition [itex]V\to 0[/itex] at [itex]|\textbf{r}|\to \infty[/itex].
 
Well, I'm just going to go to the professor's office hour, thanks though!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K