| Thread Closed |
Proof I don't even know how to start |
Share Thread |
| Oct1-09, 02:34 PM | #1 |
|
|
Proof I don't even know how to start
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Let [tex]f(x) = a_{1}\sinx + a_2\sin(2x) + ... + a_Nsin(Nx)[/tex] where N[tex]\geq[/tex]1 is an integer and [tex]a_1, ... , a_N \in\Re[/tex]. Prove that for every [tex]n = 1, ... , N[/tex] we have [tex]a_n = \frac{1}{\pi}\int{f(x)\sin(nx)dx}[/tex] with the integral going from -[tex]\pi[/tex] to [tex]\pi[/tex] (sorry I don't know how to write definite integrals in LaTeX) For some reason, it's not showing the integral sign. Before [tex]\sin(nx)dx[/tex] there should be an integral sign followed by [tex]f(x)[/tex], but it's not showing up. 2. Relevant equations 3. The attempt at a solution I have no idea how to even start it. I'm not looking for the solution, just a push in the right direction. Your answers to all of my other questions of late have been spot on and for that I thank everyone who has responded. Thanks in advance for your help with this problem! |
| Oct1-09, 02:57 PM | #2 |
|
|
It shows up OK on my screen. Try refreshing your browser.
Try substituting the expression for [tex]f(x)[/tex] into [tex]\frac{1}{\pi} \int f(x) sin(nx) dx[/tex] and using trig identities. You will save yourself some work if you keep in mind that [tex]\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} sin(ax) dx = 0[/tex] for any real number [tex]a[/tex]. |
| Oct1-09, 04:12 PM | #3 |
|
|
First is f(x) really equal to what you have? [itex]f(x)= a_1 sin(x)+ a_2 sin(2x)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot a_N sin(Nx)[/itex] would make more sense!
Assuming that is what it should be, look at [tex]\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}f(x)sin(nx)dx= \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\pi}^\pi (a_1+a_2sin(2x)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_Nsin(Nx))sin(nx) dx[/tex] [tex]= \frac{1}{\pi}a_1\int_{-\pi}^\pi} sin(x)sin(nx)dx+ \frac{1}{\pi}a_2\int_{-\pi}^\pi}sin(2x)sin(nx)dx+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ \frac{1}{\pi}a_N \int_{-\pi}^\pi} sin(Nx))sin(nx)dx[/tex] And also consider the value of [tex]\int_{-\pi}^\pi} sin(mx)sin(nx)dx[/itex] for m= n and for [itex]m\ne n[/tex]. |
| Oct1-09, 06:14 PM | #4 |
|
|
Proof I don't even know how to start
Oh, I proved the second part of your post in part a of the problem and did not realize that it was involved in any way; thanks!
|
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: Proof I don't even know how to start
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Where to start | Mechanical Engineering | 0 | ||
| Analysis calculus proof kick start question | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 4 | ||
| How do i start this? Help please! | Introductory Physics Homework | 4 | ||
| How to start again with QFT? | Quantum Physics | 4 | ||
| where do i start? | Introductory Physics Homework | 5 | ||